From: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, wayneb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
tj@kernel.org, mbizon@freebox.fr, jgarzik@pobox.com
Subject: Re: libata/ipr/powerpc: regression between 2.6.39-rc4 and 2.6.39-rc5
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:02:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF90FCA.1040706@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110615191747.GA6324@us.ibm.com>
On 06/15/2011 02:17 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> From what I can tell, the only place that explicitly clears the FROZEN
> flag is the error-handling code via ata_eh_thaw_port().
>
> So I thought either we're not invoking the error-handler at probe time
> correctly to kick the port or perhaps the SAS code is not clearing the
> flag?
>
> I tried the following patch:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index d51f979..abd0e0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -3797,6 +3797,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sas_port_alloc);
> */
> int ata_sas_port_start(struct ata_port *ap)
> {
> + ap->pflags &= ~ATA_PFLAG_FROZEN;
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sas_port_start);
>
> and the CD-ROM drive works, but I have no idea if it's the right thing
> to do. I chose this particular change, FWIW, because we call
> ata_sas_port_start before we probe in ata_sas_port_init and it seems
> like we need to mark the port as not frozen before we init it? Perhaps
> that should really be a call to a thaw function, not sure. Let's just
> say the ATA/SAS/SCSI interactions are a bit hard to follow at first :)
That looks like the right thing to do. For ipr's usage of
libata, we don't have the concept of a port frozen state, so this flag
should really never get set. The alternate way to fix this would be to
only set ATA_PFLAG_FROZEN in ata_port_alloc if ap->ops->error_handler
is not NULL.
Thanks,
Brian
--
Brian King
Linux on Power Virtualization
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-15 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-15 19:17 libata/ipr/powerpc: regression between 2.6.39-rc4 and 2.6.39-rc5 Nishanth Aravamudan
2011-06-15 20:02 ` Brian King [this message]
2011-06-15 23:34 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2011-06-16 7:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-16 13:28 ` Brian King
2011-06-16 15:28 ` [PATCH] libata/sas: only set FROZEN flag if new EH is supported Nishanth Aravamudan
2011-06-21 16:07 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2011-06-21 20:30 ` Brian King
2011-06-21 20:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-06-23 4:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-23 4:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-23 5:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-23 17:15 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2011-06-23 20:05 ` Brian King
2011-06-23 21:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF90FCA.1040706@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mbizon@freebox.fr \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=wayneb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).