linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, wayneb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	mbizon@freebox.fr, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata/sas: only set FROZEN flag if new EH is supported
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:30:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E00FF58.7070802@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110621160714.GA14174@us.ibm.com>

Looks good to me. Jeff/Tejun - any issues with merging this?

Thanks,

Brian

On 06/21/2011 11:07 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Ping on this -- Tejun, Brian, Jeff, this is a pretty annoying 2.6.39
> regression which it would be good to have fixed in 3.0.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nish
> 
> On 16.06.2011 [08:28:36 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>> On 16.06.2011 [08:28:39 -0500], Brian King wrote:
>>> On 06/16/2011 02:51 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:34:17PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>>>>>> That looks like the right thing to do. For ipr's usage of
>>>>>> libata, we don't have the concept of a port frozen state, so this flag
>>>>>> should really never get set. The alternate way to fix this would be to
>>>>>> only set ATA_PFLAG_FROZEN in ata_port_alloc if ap->ops->error_handler
>>>>>> is not NULL.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seemed like ipr is as you say, but I wasn't sure if it was
>>>>> appropriate to make the change above in the common libata-scis code or
>>>>> not. I don't want to break some other device on accident.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, I tried your suggestion, but I don't think that can happen in
>>>>> ata_port_alloc? ata_port_alloc is allocated ap itself, and it seems like
>>>>> ap->ops typically gets set only after ata_port_alloc returns?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we can test error_handler in ata_sas_port_start()?
>>>
>>> Good point. Since libsas is converted to the new eh now, we would need to have
>>> this test.
>>
>> Commit 7b3a24c57d2eeda8dba9c205342b12689c4679f9 ("ahci: don't enable
>> port irq before handler is registered") caused a regression for CD-ROMs
>> attached to the IPR SATA bus on Power machines:
>>
>>   ata_port_alloc: ENTER
>>   ata_port_probe: ata1: bus probe begin
>>   ata1.00: ata_dev_read_id: ENTER
>>   ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x40)
>>   ata1.00: ata_dev_read_id: ENTER
>>   ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x40)
>>   ata1.00: limiting speed to UDMA7:PIO5
>>   ata1.00: ata_dev_read_id: ENTER
>>   ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x40)
>>   ata1.00: disabled
>>   ata_port_probe: ata1: bus probe end
>>   scsi_alloc_sdev: Allocation failure during SCSI scanning, some SCSI devices might not be configured
>>
>> The FROZEN flag added in that commit is only cleared by the new EH code,
>> which is not used by ipr. Clear this flag in the SAS code if we don't
>> support new EH.
>>
>> Reported-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
>> index d51f979..ebe1685 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
>> @@ -3797,6 +3797,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sas_port_alloc);
>>   */
>>  int ata_sas_port_start(struct ata_port *ap)
>>  {
>> +	/*
>> +	 * the port is marked as frozen at allocation time, but if we don't
>> +	 * have new eh, we won't thaw it
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!ap->ops->error_handler)
>> +		ap->pflags &= ~ATA_PFLAG_FROZEN;
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sas_port_start);
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
>> IBM Linux Technology Center
> 


-- 
Brian King
Linux on Power Virtualization
IBM Linux Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-21 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-15 19:17 libata/ipr/powerpc: regression between 2.6.39-rc4 and 2.6.39-rc5 Nishanth Aravamudan
2011-06-15 20:02 ` Brian King
2011-06-15 23:34   ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2011-06-16  7:51     ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-16 13:28       ` Brian King
2011-06-16 15:28         ` [PATCH] libata/sas: only set FROZEN flag if new EH is supported Nishanth Aravamudan
2011-06-21 16:07           ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2011-06-21 20:30             ` Brian King [this message]
2011-06-21 20:39               ` Jeff Garzik
2011-06-23  4:31               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-23  4:42                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-23  5:10                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-23 17:15                   ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2011-06-23 20:05                     ` Brian King
2011-06-23 21:43                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E00FF58.7070802@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mbizon@freebox.fr \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=wayneb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).