From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13715B6F69 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 05:43:02 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4E403C3C.1050001@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:42:52 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baruch Siach Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: 85xx: separate e500 from e500mc References: <1fb57aeaeefcc40f6646d026caba8d40371d18fb.1312175199.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> <029dda0b5fef124811bd4c577bdade25d7f93fba.1312794031.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> In-Reply-To: <029dda0b5fef124811bd4c577bdade25d7f93fba.1312794031.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Timur Tabi List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08/08/2011 04:07 AM, Baruch Siach wrote: > CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, thus > breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. > > This patch adds a new "Processor Type" entry for e500mc, and makes e500 systems > depend on PPC_E500. I can see confusion coming from having CONFIG_E500 and CONFIG_PPC_E500... Maybe CONFIG_PPC_E500V1_2? Or CONFIG_PPC_E500V2, with a note in the kconfig help that it supports e500v1 as well. -Scott