From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4E451B20.2070207@grandegger.com> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:22:56 +0200 From: Wolfgang Grandegger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robin Holt Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 5/6] flexcan: Prefer device tree clock frequency if available. References: <1313138752-24006-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> <1313138752-24006-6-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <1313138752-24006-6-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, U Bhaskar-B22300 , socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de, Scott Wood , PPC list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08/12/2011 10:45 AM, Robin Holt wrote: > If our CAN device's device tree node has a clock-frequency property, > then use that value for the can devices clock frequency. If not, fall > back to asking the platform/mach code for the clock frequency associated > with the flexcan device. > > Signed-off-by: Robin Holt > To: Kumar Gala > To: Wolfgang Grandegger , > To: Marc Kleine-Budde , > To: U Bhaskar-B22300 > To: Scott Wood > To: Grant Likely > Cc: socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de, > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, > Cc: PPC list > Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger >>From the Socket-CAN point of view, this and the other patches can go in. Thanks for your effort. Wolfgang.