From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8E10B7461 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:41:07 +1000 (EST) From: Tabi Timur-B04825 To: Tabi Timur-B04825 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: claim the IRQ when the fsl_ssi device is probed, not opened Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:41:02 +0000 Message-ID: <4E4AF1FE.9010907@freescale.com> References: <1313534150-6642-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <1313534150-6642-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" , "lrg@ti.com" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Timur Tabi wrote: > The PowerPC Freescale SSI driver is claiming the IRQ when the IRQ when > the device is opened, which means that the /proc/interrupts entry for > the SSI exists only during playback or capture. This also meant that > the user won't know that the IRQ number is wrong until he tries to use > the device. Instead, we should claim the IRQ when the device is probed. > > Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi Ugh, somehow I got my patches criss-crossed. Ignore this, please. I'll=20 post a V2 in just a minute.=