From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231D6B6F7E for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 20:51:52 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4E5234B7.7000700@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:51:35 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: kvm PCI assignment & VFIO ramblings References: <1312050011.2265.185.camel@x201.home> <20110802082848.GD29719@yookeroo.fritz.box> <1312308847.2653.467.camel@bling.home> <1312310121.2653.470.camel@bling.home> <20110803020422.GF29719@yookeroo.fritz.box> <4E3F9E33.5000706@redhat.com> <1312932258.4524.55.camel@bling.home> <1312944513.29273.28.camel@pasglop> <1313859105.6866.192.camel@x201.home> <4E51F782.7060005@redhat.com> <20110822104635.GC2079@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <20110822104635.GC2079@amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Mackerras , qemu-devel , iommu , chrisw , Alex Williamson , Anthony Liguori , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , linuxppc-dev , "benve@cisco.com" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08/22/2011 01:46 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > $ readlink /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:19.0/iommu_group > > ../../../path/to/device/which/represents/the/resource/constraint > > > > (the pci-to-pci bridge on x86, or whatever node represents partitionable > > endpoints on power) > > That does not work. The bridge in question may not even be visible as a > PCI device, so you can't link to it. This is the case on a few PCIe > cards which only have a PCIx chip and a PCIe-2-PCIx bridge to implement > the PCIe interface (yes, I have seen those cards). > How does the kernel detect that devices behind the invisible bridge must be assigned as a unit? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function