linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: LiuShuo <b35362@freescale.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@freescale.com>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
	Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com>,
	"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:09:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5319E8.50903@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E52819C.8080204@freescale.com>

=E4=BA=8E 2011=E5=B9=B408=E6=9C=8823=E6=97=A5 00:19, Scott Wood =E5=86=99=
=E9=81=93:
> On 08/22/2011 11:13 AM, Matthieu CASTET wrote:
>> Scott Wood a =C3=A9crit :
>>> To eliminate it we'd need to do an extra data transfer without reissu=
ing
>>> the command, which Shuo was unable to get to work.
>>>
>> That's weird because our controller seems quite flexible [1].
>>
>> Something like that should work ?
>>
>>              out_be32(&lbc->fir,
>>                       (FIR_OP_CM2<<  FIR_OP0_SHIFT) |
>>                       (FIR_OP_CA<<  FIR_OP1_SHIFT) |
>>                       (FIR_OP_PA<<  FIR_OP2_SHIFT) |
>>                       (FIR_OP_WB<<  FIR_OP3_SHIFT));
>> refill FCM buffer with next 2k data
>>
>>              out_be32(&lbc->fir,
>>                       (FIR_OP_WB<<  FIR_OP3_SHIFT) |
>>                       (FIR_OP_CM3<<  FIR_OP4_SHIFT) |
>>                       (FIR_OP_CW1<<  FIR_OP5_SHIFT) |
>>                       (FIR_OP_RS<<  FIR_OP6_SHIFT));
> Something like that is what I originally suggested, but Shuo said it
> didn't work (even in theory, it requires a CE-don't-care NAND chip,
> since bus atomicity is broken).
>
> Shuo, what specifically did you try, and what did you see happen?
>
> -Scott
First, if we want to read 4K data with once command issuing, we can't=20
use HW_ECC.
Even if we use SW_ECC, we always get lots of weird '0xFF's between 1st=20
2k and 2nd 2k data.
They will cover the data in the head of 2nd 2K.
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
--------------
| xxxxxx ... 1st 2k xxxxxxx ... | ff ff ff ... ff xxxxxx 2nd 2k xxxxxxx |
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
--------------

It is worse to write 4k data with once command issuing. It can't write=20
the 2nd data correctly.

-Liu Shuo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-23  3:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-18  2:33 [PATCH v3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip b35362
2011-08-18 16:25 ` Scott Wood
2011-08-18 18:27   ` Scott Wood
2011-08-23  8:37   ` LiuShuo
2011-08-23 10:02     ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-23 16:12       ` Scott Wood
2011-08-25 11:18         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-24  2:48       ` LiuShuo
2011-08-25 11:25         ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-09-01  9:41           ` LiuShuo
2011-09-01 22:30             ` Scott Wood
2011-08-18 17:00 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-18 18:24   ` Scott Wood
2011-08-19  3:20   ` LiuShuo
2011-08-19  8:57     ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-19 18:10       ` Scott Wood
2011-08-22 10:58         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22 15:25           ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-22 16:04             ` Scott Wood
2011-08-22 16:13               ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-22 16:19                 ` Scott Wood
2011-08-22 17:05                   ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-23  3:09                   ` LiuShuo [this message]
2011-08-23  8:14                     ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-23  9:57                       ` LiuShuo
2011-08-23 10:13                         ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-22 15:58           ` Scott Wood
2011-08-25 11:06             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22 10:53 ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E5319E8.50903@freescale.com \
    --to=b35362@freescale.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=ivan.djelic@parrot.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=matthieu.castet@parrot.com \
    --cc=r58472@freescale.com \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).