linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: LiuShuo <b35362@freescale.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@freescale.com>,
	Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:30:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E60077A.8070304@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5F5360.6060400@freescale.com>

On 09/01/2011 04:41 AM, LiuShuo wrote:
> After doing some tests, I found that the elbc controller can read/write
> 4k with one command
> if we insert a FIR_OP_NOP between first half reading/wring and second
> half reading/writing.(delay for something ?)

>From the docs:

> A NOP instruction that appears in FIR ahead of the last instruction
> is executed with the timing of a regular command instruction, but
> neither LFCLE nor LFWE are asserted.  Thus a NOP instruction may be
> used to insert a pause matching the time taken for a regular command
> write.

So the NOP does generate a delay.  Would be nice to know exactly why
it's required.

Have you tried doing this under load with parallel NOR activity?  With
CE-don't-care operation, during the times when CE is not asserted, does
it matter what happens with CLE/ALE/RE?  These signals could be driven
for another chipselect during that time.

-Scott

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-01 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-18  2:33 [PATCH v3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip b35362
2011-08-18 16:25 ` Scott Wood
2011-08-18 18:27   ` Scott Wood
2011-08-23  8:37   ` LiuShuo
2011-08-23 10:02     ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-23 16:12       ` Scott Wood
2011-08-25 11:18         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-24  2:48       ` LiuShuo
2011-08-25 11:25         ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-09-01  9:41           ` LiuShuo
2011-09-01 22:30             ` Scott Wood [this message]
2011-08-18 17:00 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-18 18:24   ` Scott Wood
2011-08-19  3:20   ` LiuShuo
2011-08-19  8:57     ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-19 18:10       ` Scott Wood
2011-08-22 10:58         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22 15:25           ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-22 16:04             ` Scott Wood
2011-08-22 16:13               ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-22 16:19                 ` Scott Wood
2011-08-22 17:05                   ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-23  3:09                   ` LiuShuo
2011-08-23  8:14                     ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-23  9:57                       ` LiuShuo
2011-08-23 10:13                         ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-22 15:58           ` Scott Wood
2011-08-25 11:06             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22 10:53 ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E60077A.8070304@freescale.com \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=b35362@freescale.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=matthieu.castet@parrot.com \
    --cc=r58472@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).