From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: LiuShuo <b35362@freescale.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@freescale.com>,
Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:30:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E60077A.8070304@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5F5360.6060400@freescale.com>
On 09/01/2011 04:41 AM, LiuShuo wrote:
> After doing some tests, I found that the elbc controller can read/write
> 4k with one command
> if we insert a FIR_OP_NOP between first half reading/wring and second
> half reading/writing.(delay for something ?)
>From the docs:
> A NOP instruction that appears in FIR ahead of the last instruction
> is executed with the timing of a regular command instruction, but
> neither LFCLE nor LFWE are asserted. Thus a NOP instruction may be
> used to insert a pause matching the time taken for a regular command
> write.
So the NOP does generate a delay. Would be nice to know exactly why
it's required.
Have you tried doing this under load with parallel NOR activity? With
CE-don't-care operation, during the times when CE is not asserted, does
it matter what happens with CLE/ALE/RE? These signals could be driven
for another chipselect during that time.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-01 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-18 2:33 [PATCH v3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip b35362
2011-08-18 16:25 ` Scott Wood
2011-08-18 18:27 ` Scott Wood
2011-08-23 8:37 ` LiuShuo
2011-08-23 10:02 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-23 16:12 ` Scott Wood
2011-08-25 11:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-24 2:48 ` LiuShuo
2011-08-25 11:25 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-09-01 9:41 ` LiuShuo
2011-09-01 22:30 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2011-08-18 17:00 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-18 18:24 ` Scott Wood
2011-08-19 3:20 ` LiuShuo
2011-08-19 8:57 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-19 18:10 ` Scott Wood
2011-08-22 10:58 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22 15:25 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-22 16:04 ` Scott Wood
2011-08-22 16:13 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-22 16:19 ` Scott Wood
2011-08-22 17:05 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-23 3:09 ` LiuShuo
2011-08-23 8:14 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-23 9:57 ` LiuShuo
2011-08-23 10:13 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-08-22 15:58 ` Scott Wood
2011-08-25 11:06 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22 10:53 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E60077A.8070304@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=b35362@freescale.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=matthieu.castet@parrot.com \
--cc=r58472@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).