From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 906061007D3 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:16:03 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4E7BC1A9.5050708@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:15:53 -0500 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty: don't use the byte channel handle as a parameter in ehv_bytechan.c References: <1316543217-13769-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <20110922230640.GA16981@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20110922230640.GA16981@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-console@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Greg KH wrote: > This patch doesn't apply at all to my tty tree, what was it made > against? An internal repository that supposed to be in-sync with the latest and greatest. What's the URL for your tty-next repo? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale