From: "Juntang Fu(David)" <juntang.fu@windriver.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>,
Andy@sna.ihostsxode.net
Subject: Re: oprofile callgraph support missing for common cpus
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:58:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ECF2E87.9060900@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322198672.32635.24.camel@pasglop>
On 11/25/2011 01:24 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 09:22 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
>> I forgot to ask, oprofile mentions setting -no-omit-framepointer to get
>> correct backtrace but I cannot turn on frame pointers for the ppc kernel.
>> Isn't frame pointers needed for pcc? what about user space?
> PowerPC always has frame pointers, ignore that :-)
Recently I have met a similar problem on frame pointer but at arm_v7
variant in back tracing
support for Oprofile, could you help me see it? thanks in advance:
in my case, I have enabled Oprofile support in my arm_v7 thumb2 target,
in the created binary image
including kernel image and rootfs, seems that frame pointer is not
enabled for arm thumb2, So I have met
the following problems in back trace:
I can get the right stack traces for kernel stack, but for user stack, the
stack length is always one depth, why?
Is this a known deficiency in supporting arm thumb2 for Oprofile stack
trace?
Thanks.
B.R.
--David
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
> _______________________________________________
> oprofile-list mailing list
> oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oprofile-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-25 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-17 8:38 oprofile callgraph support missing for common cpus Joakim Tjernlund
2011-11-17 17:30 ` Maynard Johnson
2011-11-17 17:51 ` Andy Fleming
2011-11-17 21:27 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-11-17 23:20 ` Robert Richter
2011-11-18 8:09 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-11-18 8:22 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-11-25 5:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-11-25 5:58 ` Juntang Fu(David) [this message]
2011-12-05 8:50 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-12-05 9:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ECF2E87.9060900@windriver.com \
--to=juntang.fu@windriver.com \
--cc=Andy@sna.ihostsxode.net \
--cc=afleming@freescale.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).