From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <B07421@freescale.com>
Received: from AM1EHSOBE005.bigfish.com (am1ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com
 [213.199.154.208])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com",
 Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (verified OK))
 by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C8CB6F75
 for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Sat,  3 Dec 2011 09:34:55 +1100 (EST)
Received: from mail90-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by mail90-am1-R.bigfish.com
 (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEFB6404DC	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>;
 Fri,  2 Dec 2011 22:34:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AM1EHSMHS014.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.252])	by
 mail90-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA73540042	for
 <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Fri,  2 Dec 2011 22:34:50 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4ED95287.1010606@freescale.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:34:47 -0600
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/85xx: add a 32-bit P1022DS device tree
References: <1322863714-6818-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com>
 <1322863714-6818-2-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com>
 <4ED94EF5.2090406@freescale.com> <4ED95006.9010301@freescale.com>
In-Reply-To: <4ED95006.9010301@freescale.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kumar.gala@freescale.com
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On 12/02/2011 04:24 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote:
> 
>> Please add something after post to strip simple-bus off of the localbus
>> node's compatible.  Either you have board-control@0,0, or you have the
>> other stuff (did you ever find out what the situation with NAND is?) --
>> not both at the same time.  Or do you have U-Boot patching in status
>> updates now?
> 
> I posted a Linux patch that disables the NOR flash node if video needs to be enabled. 
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/126459/
> 
> However, I only now notice that Kumar requested some changes.

Nothing that happens in Linux excuses handing Linux a device tree that
is wrong.  That you need special handling in Linux indicates that this
is not a simple-bus.

-Scott