* linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
@ 2011-12-14 7:15 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-14 16:32 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-12-14 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra
Cc: linux-next, Paul Mackerras, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1476 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
produced these warnings:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-offsets.h:1:0,
from kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:9:
include/generated/asm-offsets.h:15:0: warning: "NMI_MASK" redefined [enabled by default]
include/linux/hardirq.h:56:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
include/generated/asm-offsets.h:128:0: warning: "CLONE_VM" redefined [enabled by default]
include/linux/sched.h:8:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
include/generated/asm-offsets.h:129:0: warning: "CLONE_UNTRACED" redefined [enabled by default]
include/linux/sched.h:22:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
include/generated/asm-offsets.h:165:0: warning: "NSEC_PER_SEC" redefined [enabled by default]
include/linux/time.h:40:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
include/generated/asm-offsets.h:173:0: warning: "PGD_TABLE_SIZE" redefined [enabled by default]
arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64-4k.h:17:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
Maybe caused by commit d5e553d6e0a4 ("trace: Include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
in trace_syscalls.c") from the tip tree. These warnings may have been
here for a while as it is hard to catch the new ones among the flood.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
2011-12-14 7:15 linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-12-14 16:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-14 16:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2011-12-14 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, linux-kernel, linux-next, Paul Mackerras,
H. Peter Anvin, Thomas Gleixner, linuxppc-dev, Ingo Molnar
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Maybe caused by commit d5e553d6e0a4 ("trace: Include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> in trace_syscalls.c") from the tip tree. These warnings may have been
> here for a while as it is hard to catch the new ones among the flood.
>
hpa,
Was this change only needed for x86? If so, could you put that into
asm/ftrace.h instead?
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
2011-12-14 16:32 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2011-12-14 16:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-12-22 5:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2011-12-14 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Peter Zijlstra, linux-kernel, linux-next,
Paul Mackerras, Thomas Gleixner, linuxppc-dev, Ingo Molnar
On 12/14/2011 08:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Maybe caused by commit d5e553d6e0a4 ("trace: Include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>> in trace_syscalls.c") from the tip tree. These warnings may have been
>> here for a while as it is hard to catch the new ones among the flood.
>>
>
> hpa,
>
> Was this change only needed for x86? If so, could you put that into
> asm/ftrace.h instead?
>
Yes (on both accounts). It was part of the syscall changes; I'll move
the include.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
2011-12-14 16:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
@ 2011-12-22 5:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-04 8:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-12-22 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, linux-kernel, Steven Rostedt, linux-next,
Paul Mackerras, Thomas Gleixner, linuxppc-dev, Ingo Molnar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 752 bytes --]
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:47:01 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/14/2011 08:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe caused by commit d5e553d6e0a4 ("trace: Include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> >> in trace_syscalls.c") from the tip tree. These warnings may have been
> >> here for a while as it is hard to catch the new ones among the flood.
> >>
> >
> > hpa,
> >
> > Was this change only needed for x86? If so, could you put that into
> > asm/ftrace.h instead?
> >
>
> Yes (on both accounts). It was part of the syscall changes; I'll move
> the include.
Ping?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
2011-12-22 5:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-01-04 8:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-04 9:23 ` hpanvin@gmail.com
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-04 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, linux-kernel, Steven Rostedt, linux-next,
Paul Mackerras, Thomas Gleixner, linuxppc-dev, Ingo Molnar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 942 bytes --]
Hi again,
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:33:04 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:47:01 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/14/2011 08:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > >> Maybe caused by commit d5e553d6e0a4 ("trace: Include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> > >> in trace_syscalls.c") from the tip tree. These warnings may have been
> > >> here for a while as it is hard to catch the new ones among the flood.
> > >>
> > >
> > > hpa,
> > >
> > > Was this change only needed for x86? If so, could you put that into
> > > asm/ftrace.h instead?
> >
> > Yes (on both accounts). It was part of the syscall changes; I'll move
> > the include.
>
> Ping?
Can we please have this fixed ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
2012-01-04 8:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-01-04 9:23 ` hpanvin@gmail.com
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hpanvin@gmail.com @ 2012-01-04 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, linux-kernel, Steven Rostedt, linux-next,
Paul Mackerras, Thomas Gleixner, linuxppc-dev, Ingo Molnar
I thought it had been...? Need to investigate (as baby permits...)
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>Hi again,
>
>On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:33:04 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
><sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:47:01 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
>wrote:
>> >
>> > On 12/14/2011 08:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Maybe caused by commit d5e553d6e0a4 ("trace: Include
><asm/asm-offsets.h>
>> > >> in trace_syscalls.c") from the tip tree. These warnings may
>have been
>> > >> here for a while as it is hard to catch the new ones among the
>flood.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > hpa,
>> > >
>> > > Was this change only needed for x86? If so, could you put that
>into
>> > > asm/ftrace.h instead?
>> >
>> > Yes (on both accounts). It was part of the syscall changes; I'll
>move
>> > the include.
>>
>> Ping?
>
>Can we please have this fixed ...
>--
>Cheers,
>Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-04 9:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-14 7:15 linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-14 16:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-12-14 16:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-12-22 5:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-04 8:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-04 9:23 ` hpanvin@gmail.com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).