linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 00/14]
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:13:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F200DFD.7070407@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F1DD6DF.4080706@gmail.com>

On 1/23/2012 10:53 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 01/23/2012 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> Here's the second RFC for the irq_domain patches.  I could use some
>> help testing now.  I still expect there will be a few bugs.  The
>> series is based on v3.3-rc1, and I've pushed it out to my git server:
>>
>> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git irqdomain/next
>
> Can you post to linux-arm-kernel too so people are aware of this work
> and stop posting dead-end irqdomain patches.

Good point, I have two pending series that are using the 
irq_domain_add() so far, so it will be good to have that branch pulled 
in arm-soc.

> I tested what you had as of this morning and it works fine for me. Looks
> like the only diff is the VExpress code. I'm working on rebasing my
> domain support for generic irqchip now.

In fact your generic irqchip should even avoid us to use 
irq_domain_add_legacy() since both GPIO and OMAP3 intc are already using 
the irqchip.

I guess you are not going to change the interface so the patches I did 
on your previous branch to try them should be good already, isn't it?

Thanks,
Benoit

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-25 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-23 21:07 [RFCv2 00/14] Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 01/14] irq_domain: add documentation and MAINTAINERS entry Grant Likely
2012-01-24 19:13   ` Randy Dunlap
2012-01-28 17:05     ` Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 02/14] dt: Make irqdomain less verbose Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 03/14] irq_domain: Make irq_domain structure match powerpc's irq_host Grant Likely
2012-01-24 21:38   ` Rob Herring
2012-01-24 22:08     ` Grant Likely
2012-01-24 22:11       ` Rob Herring
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 04/14] irq_domain: convert microblaze from irq_host to irq_domain Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 05/14] irq_domain/powerpc: Use common irq_domain structure instead of irq_host Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 06/14] irq_domain/powerpc: eliminate irq_map; use irq_alloc_desc() instead Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 07/14] irq_domain/powerpc: Eliminate virq_is_host() Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 08/14] irq_domain: Move irq_domain code from powerpc to kernel/irq Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 09/14] irqdomain: remove NO_IRQ from irq domain code Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 10/14] irq_domain: Remove references to old irq_host names Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 11/14] irq_domain: Replace irq_alloc_host() with revmap-specific initializers Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 12/14] irq_domain: Add support for base irq and hwirq in legacy mappings Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 13/14] irq_domain: Remove 'new' irq_domain in favour of the ppc one Grant Likely
2012-01-24 22:10   ` Rob Herring
2012-01-25  0:26     ` Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 14/14] irq_domain: Remove irq_domain_add_simple() Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:53 ` [RFCv2 00/14] Rob Herring
2012-01-25 14:13   ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2012-01-25 18:51     ` Rob Herring
2012-01-26 21:33       ` Grant Likely
2012-01-27 22:08         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-01-27 22:13           ` Grant Likely
2012-01-25 22:53 ` Mark Salter
2012-01-26 13:38   ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F200DFD.7070407@ti.com \
    --to=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=miltonm@bga.com \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).