From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 00/14]
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:51:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F204F1C.70908@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F200DFD.7070407@ti.com>
On 01/25/2012 08:13 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 1/23/2012 10:53 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 01/23/2012 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey everyone,
>>>
>>> Here's the second RFC for the irq_domain patches. I could use some
>>> help testing now. I still expect there will be a few bugs. The
>>> series is based on v3.3-rc1, and I've pushed it out to my git server:
>>>
>>> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git irqdomain/next
>>
>> Can you post to linux-arm-kernel too so people are aware of this work
>> and stop posting dead-end irqdomain patches.
>
> Good point, I have two pending series that are using the
> irq_domain_add() so far, so it will be good to have that branch pulled
> in arm-soc.
>
>> I tested what you had as of this morning and it works fine for me. Looks
>> like the only diff is the VExpress code. I'm working on rebasing my
>> domain support for generic irqchip now.
>
> In fact your generic irqchip should even avoid us to use
> irq_domain_add_legacy() since both GPIO and OMAP3 intc are already using
> the irqchip.
>
> I guess you are not going to change the interface so the patches I did
> on your previous branch to try them should be good already, isn't it?
I've got it rebased on top of Grant's tree. I will send it out soon.
One problem that still remains is it breaks x86 and any platform using
generic irq chip, but not selecting IRQ_DOMAIN. Grant, do you plan to
enable IRQ_DOMAIN for x86 in your series? MIPS may also need fixing.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-25 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-23 21:07 [RFCv2 00/14] Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 01/14] irq_domain: add documentation and MAINTAINERS entry Grant Likely
2012-01-24 19:13 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-01-28 17:05 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 02/14] dt: Make irqdomain less verbose Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 03/14] irq_domain: Make irq_domain structure match powerpc's irq_host Grant Likely
2012-01-24 21:38 ` Rob Herring
2012-01-24 22:08 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-24 22:11 ` Rob Herring
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 04/14] irq_domain: convert microblaze from irq_host to irq_domain Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 05/14] irq_domain/powerpc: Use common irq_domain structure instead of irq_host Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 06/14] irq_domain/powerpc: eliminate irq_map; use irq_alloc_desc() instead Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 07/14] irq_domain/powerpc: Eliminate virq_is_host() Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 08/14] irq_domain: Move irq_domain code from powerpc to kernel/irq Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 09/14] irqdomain: remove NO_IRQ from irq domain code Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 10/14] irq_domain: Remove references to old irq_host names Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 11/14] irq_domain: Replace irq_alloc_host() with revmap-specific initializers Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 12/14] irq_domain: Add support for base irq and hwirq in legacy mappings Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 13/14] irq_domain: Remove 'new' irq_domain in favour of the ppc one Grant Likely
2012-01-24 22:10 ` Rob Herring
2012-01-25 0:26 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:07 ` [RFCv2 14/14] irq_domain: Remove irq_domain_add_simple() Grant Likely
2012-01-23 21:53 ` [RFCv2 00/14] Rob Herring
2012-01-25 14:13 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-01-25 18:51 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2012-01-26 21:33 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-27 22:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-01-27 22:13 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-25 22:53 ` Mark Salter
2012-01-26 13:38 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F204F1C.70908@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).