From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from TX2EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E334B71A6 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:10:55 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4F283CB7.4050908@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:10:47 -0600 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] powerpc/dts: Add dts for p1025rdb board References: <1328003481-31821-1-git-send-email-B32736@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Zhicheng Fan , Zhicheng Fan List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 01/31/2012 09:55 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2012, at 3:51 AM, Zhicheng Fan wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Zhicheng Fan >> --- >> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1025si-post.dtsi | 228 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1025si-pre.dtsi | 70 +++++++ >> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1025rdb.dts | 137 +++++++++++++ >> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1025rdb.dtsi | 286 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1025rdb_36b.dts | 88 ++++++++ >> 5 files changed, 809 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1025si-post.dtsi >> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1025si-pre.dtsi >> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1025rdb.dts >> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1025rdb.dtsi >> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1025rdb_36b.dts > > For the p1024 & p1025 I do NOT want to add new dts/fsl/p1025si*.dtsi files. We should use the p1020 and p1021 as they are identical. Are they sufficiently software compatible that we want to use p1020/p1021 in all the compatible strings? If yes, how was this verified? -Scott