From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sjogate2.atmel.com (newsmtp5.atmel.com [204.2.163.5]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF99FB71AB for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 05:33:38 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4F316848.4060100@atmel.com> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:07:04 +0100 From: Nicolas Ferre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/25] irq_domain: remove "hint" when allocating irq numbers References: <1327700179-17454-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> <1327700179-17454-25-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> In-Reply-To: <1327700179-17454-25-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Stephen Rothwell , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Milton Miller , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 01/27/2012 10:36 PM, Grant Likely : > The 'hint' used to try and line up irq numbers with hw irq numbers is > rather a hack and not very useful. Now that /proc/interrupts also outputs > the hwirq number, it is even less useful to keep around the 'hint' heuristic. > > This patch removes it. Grant, While trying your patch series in conjunction with Rob one, I do not find this patch in your irqdomain/next branch (and a couple of others). Can you tell me if this v3 series is available as a git tree? Thanks, best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre