From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: "<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"<kvm@vger.kernel.org>" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"<kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>" <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Don't sync timebase when inside KVM
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:06:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4E771D.1040403@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39AA9511-4D56-4087-BC98-4BB32EF048AA@suse.de>
On 02/29/2012 12:28 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 29.02.2012, at 18:50, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:
>
>> On 02/28/2012 08:16 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> When we know that we're running inside of a KVM guest, we don't have to
>>> worry about synchronizing timebases between different CPUs, since the
>>> host already took care of that.
>>>
>>> This fixes CPU overcommit scenarios where vCPUs could hang forever trying
>>> to sync each other while not being scheduled.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Stuart Yoder <B08248@freescale.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
>>
>> This should apply to any hypervisor, not just KVM.
>
> Sure, but do you have a generic function to evaluate that? :)
The presence of a hypervisor node without testing compatible. Might not
get them all, but at least it will cover more than just KVM.
>> Which platforms are you seeing this on? If it's on Freescale chips,
>> U-Boot should be doing the sync and Linux should never do it, even in
>> the absence of a hypervisor.
>
> This is on e500mc.
On e500mc Linux should never by trying to sync the timebase. If it is,
let's fix that.
-Scott
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-29 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-29 2:16 [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Don't sync timebase when inside KVM Alexander Graf
2012-02-29 17:50 ` Scott Wood
2012-02-29 18:28 ` Alexander Graf
2012-02-29 19:06 ` Scott Wood [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4E771D.1040403@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).