From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Anthony Foiani <tkil@scrye.com>
Cc: "Robert P.J.Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@freescale.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Subject: Re: ppc/sata-fsl: orphan config value: CONFIG_MPC8315_DS
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 17:57:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC5546A.4090506@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gvcjetze3.fsf@dworkin.scrye.com>
On 05/29/2012 05:07 PM, Anthony Foiani wrote:
> Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> writes:
>
>> CONFIG_MPC831x_RDB doesn't mean that you're running on such a board,
>> only that the kernel supports those boards. It should be a runtime
>> test.
>
> Point taken.
>
> If that SATA check is CPU/SOC-based, then it should be easy enough to
> test. The cpuinfo for my board is:
>
> # cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor : 0
> cpu : e300c3
> clock : 266.666664MHz
> revision : 2.0 (pvr 8085 0020)
> bogomips : 66.66
> timebase : 33333333
>
> On the other hand, if the problem is actually caused by board trace
> routing (or other hardware that's outside the control of the CPU/SOC),
> then I don't know how possible a runtime check will be.
Board information is available from the device tree, and from platform
code that was selected based on the device tree.
> Do you know if there is a specific errata that the MPC8315_DS ran
> across that required this fix, or was it a band-aid in the first
> place?
I don't know the history of this, sorry. It looks like Yang Li added
this code -- Yang, can you answer this?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-29 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-17 17:08 ppc/sata-fsl: orphan config value: CONFIG_MPC8315_DS Anthony Foiani
2012-05-21 6:31 ` Li Yang-R58472
2012-05-26 6:53 ` Anthony Foiani
2012-05-29 18:02 ` Scott Wood
2012-05-29 22:07 ` Anthony Foiani
2012-05-29 22:57 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2012-05-30 10:59 ` Li Yang
2012-05-30 20:07 ` Anthony Foiani
2012-05-30 20:14 ` Anthony Foiani
2012-05-30 20:20 ` Scott Wood
2012-05-30 20:52 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-04-30 6:41 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-04-30 18:15 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-01 0:34 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-05-01 0:42 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-01 2:06 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-05-01 18:05 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-01 23:35 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-05-02 0:13 ` Scott Wood
2013-04-30 21:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2013-05-02 6:37 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-05-08 12:04 ` Anthony Foiani
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-08-23 19:25 Scott Wood
2013-08-23 23:41 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-08-23 23:47 ` Scott Wood
2013-08-24 8:03 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-08-27 10:51 ` Xie Shaohui-B21989
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC5546A.4090506@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=r58472@freescale.com \
--cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=tkil@scrye.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).