From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DC0FB7001 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 02:29:02 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4FC8EDC4.2050704@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:28:52 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] powerpc: Add MSR_DE to MSR_KERNEL References: <1338363814-19565-1-git-send-email-Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se> <4FC62018.3040404@mindchasers.com> <1338542089.16119.48.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1338542089.16119.48.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Bob Cochran , support@abatron.ch List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 06/01/2012 04:14 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 09:26 -0400, Bob Cochran wrote: >> I believe that additional patches are required for CodeWarrior to >> work >> properly (e.g., assembly start up). I think the patches should come >> from Freescale. For whatever reason, they include them in their SDK, >> but haven't submitted them for inclusion in the mainline. >> >> As a developer on Freescale Power products, I would like to see >> Freescale offer up a CodeWarrior patch set, so I don't have to manage >> the patches myself when working outside the SDK (i.e., on a more >> recent >> kernel). > > Such patches would have a hard time getting upstream considering that > codewarrior is a commercial product. It's not really about CodeWarrior -- it's needed for any external debug on these chips. Those chips are commercial products too, BTW. :-) -Scott