linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
To: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] powerpc: add "memory" attribute for mfmsr()
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:27:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFBE755.7070403@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFBE659.10804@windriver.com>

On 07/10/2012 04:22 PM, tiejun.chen wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 04:19 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:59 +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
>>> Add "memory" attribute in inline assembly language as a compiler
>>> barrier to make sure 4.6.x GCC don't reorder mfmsr().
>>
>> Out of curiosity, did you see a case where it was re-ordered
>> improperly ?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> In my scenario, there's one simple wrapper from local_irq_save().
> ------
> uint32_t XX_DisableAllIntr(void)
> {
>     unsigned long flags;
> 
>     local_irq_save(flags);
> 
>     return (uint32_t)flags;
> }
> 
> When CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT is enabled, kernel would expand
> local_irq_save(). Firstly, please refer to the follows:
> 
> #define local_irq_save(flags)               \
>     do {                        \
>         raw_local_irq_save(flags);      \
>         trace_hardirqs_off();           \
>     } while (0)
> 
> #define raw_local_irq_save(flags)           \
>     do {                        \
>         typecheck(unsigned long, flags);    \
>         flags = arch_local_irq_save();      \
>     } while (0)
> 
> static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_save(void)
> {
>     unsigned long flags = arch_local_save_flags();
> #ifdef CONFIG_BOOKE
>     asm volatile("wrteei 0" : : : "memory");
> #else
>     SET_MSR_EE(flags & ~MSR_EE);
> #endif
>     return flags;
> }
> 
> static inline unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void)
> {
>     return mfmsr();
> }
> 
> So local_irq_save(flags) is extended as something like:
> 
> {
> 	#1 flags = mfmsr();
> 	#2 asm volatile("wrteei 0" : : : "memory");
> 	#3 trace_hardirqs_off();
> }
> 
> But build kernel with our 5.0 toolchain (with/without

Note here this toolchain is based on 4.6.3.

Tiejun

> --with-toolchain-dir=wr-toolchain),
> 
> (gdb) disassemble XX_DisableAllIntr
> Dump of assembler code for function XX_DisableAllIntr:
>    0xc04550c0 <+0>:	mflr    r0
>    0xc04550c4 <+4>:	stw     r0,4(r1)
>    0xc04550c8 <+8>:	bl      0xc000f060 <mcount>
>    0xc04550cc <+12>:	stwu    r1,-16(r1)
>    0xc04550d0 <+16>:	mflr    r0
>    0xc04550d4 <+20>:	stw     r0,20(r1)
>    0xc04550d8 <+24>:	wrteei  0
>    0xc04550dc <+28>:	bl      0xc00c6c10 <trace_hardirqs_off>
>    0xc04550e0 <+32>:	mfmsr   r3
>    0xc04550e4 <+36>:	lwz     r0,20(r1)
>    0xc04550e8 <+40>:	mtlr    r0
>    0xc04550ec <+44>:	addi    r1,r1,16
>    0xc04550f0 <+48>:	blr
> End of assembler dump.
> 
> You should notice #2 and #3 is reorganized before #1. This means irq is always
> disabled before we check irq status via reading msr. Then kernel would work as
> abnormal sometimes.
> 
> But with old toolchain (4.5.x) for this same kernel, everything is fine.
> 
> Tiejun
> 
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ben.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h |    3 ++-
>>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>>> index 559da19..578e5a0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>>> @@ -1016,7 +1016,8 @@
>>>  /* Macros for setting and retrieving special purpose registers */
>>>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>>  #define mfmsr()		({unsigned long rval; \
>>> -			asm volatile("mfmsr %0" : "=r" (rval)); rval;})
>>> +			asm volatile("mfmsr %0" : "=r" (rval) : \
>>> +						: "memory"); rval;})
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
>>>  #define __mtmsrd(v, l)	asm volatile("mtmsrd %0," __stringify(l) \
>>>  				     : : "r" (v) : "memory")
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2012-07-10  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-10  7:59 [PATCH 1/1] powerpc: add "memory" attribute for mfmsr() Tiejun Chen
2012-07-10  8:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-10  8:22   ` tiejun.chen
2012-07-10  8:27     ` tiejun.chen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FFBE755.7070403@windriver.com \
    --to=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).