From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: len.brown@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
paulus@samba.org, minchan.kim@gmail.com,
kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, rientjes@google.com,
cl@linux.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, liuj97@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 11/13] memory-hotplug : free memmap of sparse-vmemmap
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:06:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFD09D5.8010605@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFAB37F.1060105@jp.fujitsu.com>
At 07/09/2012 06:33 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
> I don't think that all pages of virtual mapping in removed memory can be
> freed, since page which type is MIX_SECTION_INFO is difficult to free.
> So, the patch only frees page which type is SECTION_INFO at first.
>
> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mm.h | 2 +
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 ++
> mm/sparse.c | 5 +-
> 4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-3.5-rc4/include/linux/mm.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.5-rc4.orig/include/linux/mm.h 2012-07-03 14:22:18.530011567 +0900
> +++ linux-3.5-rc4/include/linux/mm.h 2012-07-03 14:22:20.999983872 +0900
> @@ -1588,6 +1588,8 @@ int vmemmap_populate(struct page *start_
> void vmemmap_populate_print_last(void);
> void register_page_bootmem_memmap(unsigned long section_nr, struct page *map,
> unsigned long size);
> +void vmemmap_kfree(struct page *memmpa, unsigned long nr_pages);
> +void vmemmap_free_bootmem(struct page *memmpa, unsigned long nr_pages);
>
> enum mf_flags {
> MF_COUNT_INCREASED = 1 << 0,
> Index: linux-3.5-rc4/mm/sparse.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.5-rc4.orig/mm/sparse.c 2012-07-03 14:21:45.071429805 +0900
> +++ linux-3.5-rc4/mm/sparse.c 2012-07-03 14:22:21.000983767 +0900
> @@ -614,12 +614,13 @@ static inline struct page *kmalloc_secti
> /* This will make the necessary allocations eventually. */
> return sparse_mem_map_populate(pnum, nid);
> }
> -static void __kfree_section_memmap(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +static void __kfree_section_memmap(struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> - return; /* XXX: Not implemented yet */
> + vmemmap_kfree(page, nr_pages);
Hmm, I think you try to free the memory allocated in kmalloc_section_memmap().
> }
> static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> + vmemmap_free_bootmem(page, nr_pages);
> }
Hmm, which function is the memory you try to free allocated in?
> #else
> static struct page *__kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long nr_pages)
> Index: linux-3.5-rc4/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.5-rc4.orig/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c 2012-07-03 14:22:18.538011465 +0900
> +++ linux-3.5-rc4/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c 2012-07-03 14:22:21.007983103 +0900
> @@ -978,6 +978,97 @@ vmemmap_populate(struct page *start_page
> return 0;
> }
>
> +unsigned long find_and_clear_pte_page(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> + struct page **pp)
> +{
> + pgd_t *pgd;
> + pud_t *pud;
> + pmd_t *pmd;
> + pte_t *pte;
> + unsigned long next;
> +
> + *pp = NULL;
> +
> + pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
> + if (pgd_none(*pgd))
> + return (addr + PAGE_SIZE) & PAGE_MASK;
Hmm, why not goto next pgd?
> +
> + pud = pud_offset(pgd, addr);
> + if (pud_none(*pud))
> + return (addr + PAGE_SIZE) & PAGE_MASK;
> +
> + if (!cpu_has_pse) {
> + next = (addr + PAGE_SIZE) & PAGE_MASK;
> + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> + if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> + return next;
> +
> + pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
> + if (pte_none(*pte))
> + return next;
> +
> + *pp = pte_page(*pte);
> + pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
I think you should flush tlb here.
> + } else {
> + next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> +
> + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> + if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> + return next;
> +
> + *pp = pmd_page(*pmd);
> + pmd_clear(pmd);
> + }
> +
> + return next;
> +}
> +
> +void __meminit
> +vmemmap_kfree(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)memmap;
> + unsigned long end = (unsigned long)(memmap + nr_pages);
> + unsigned long next;
> + unsigned int order;
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + for (; addr < end; addr = next) {
> + page = NULL;
> + next = find_and_clear_pte_page(addr, end, &page);
> + if (!page)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (is_vmalloc_addr(page_address(page)))
> + vfree(page_address(page));
Hmm, the memory is allocated in vmemmap_alloc_block(), and the address
can not be vmalloc address.
> + else {
> + order = next - addr;
> + free_pages((unsigned long)page_address(page),
> + get_order(order));
OOPS. I think we cannot free pages here.
sizeof(struct page) is less than PAGE_SIZE. We store more than one struct
page in the same page. If you free it here while the other struct page
is in use, it is very dangerous.
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void __meminit
> +vmemmap_free_bootmem(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)memmap;
> + unsigned long end = (unsigned long)(memmap + nr_pages);
> + unsigned long next;
> + struct page *page;
> + unsigned long magic;
> +
> + for (; addr < end; addr = next) {
> + page = NULL;
> + next = find_and_clear_pte_page(addr, end, &page);
> + if (!page)
> + continue;
> +
> + magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
> + if (magic == SECTION_INFO)
> + put_page_bootmem(page);
> + }
> +}
> +
> void __meminit
> register_page_bootmem_memmap(unsigned long section_nr, struct page *start_page,
> unsigned long size)
> Index: linux-3.5-rc4/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.5-rc4.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c 2012-07-03 14:22:18.522011667 +0900
> +++ linux-3.5-rc4/mm/memory_hotplug.c 2012-07-03 14:22:21.012982694 +0900
> @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ static int __meminit __add_section(int n
> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
I think this line can be removed now.
Thanks
Wen Congyang
> static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
> {
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct pglist_data *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
> int ret;
>
> if (!valid_section(ms))
> @@ -310,6 +312,9 @@ static int __remove_section(struct zone
>
> ret = unregister_memory_section(ms);
>
> + pgdat_resize_lock(pgdat, &flags);
> + sparse_remove_one_section(zone, ms);
> + pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags);
> return ret;
> }
> #else
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-11 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-09 10:21 [RFC PATCH v3 0/13] memory-hotplug : hot-remove physical memory Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/13] memory-hotplug : rename remove_memory to offline_memory Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/13] memory-hotplug : add physical memory hotplug code to acpi_memory_device_remove Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13 3:26 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 0:46 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13 3:35 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 1:44 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-17 1:54 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-17 2:32 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 3:08 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-17 3:32 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 4:51 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-17 5:17 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 5:19 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13 10:40 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 1:10 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/13] memory-hotplug : unify argument of firmware_map_add_early/hotplug Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 15:30 ` Dave Hansen
2012-07-12 4:52 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-12 13:40 ` Dave Hansen
2012-07-13 4:34 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13 5:11 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/13] memory-hotplug : remove /sys/firmware/memmap/X sysfs Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13 9:10 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 0:28 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-16 2:32 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 0:30 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/13] memory-hotplug : does not release memory region in PAGES_PER_SECTION chunks Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13 3:42 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-09 10:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/13] memory-hotplug : add memory_block_release Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/13] memory-hotplug : remove_memory calls __remove_pages Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v3 8/13] memory-hotplug : check page type in get_page_bootmem Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 9/13] memory-hotplug : move register_page_bootmem_info_node and put_page_bootmem for sparse-vmemmap Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:32 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/13] memory-hotplug : implement register_page_bootmem_info_section of sparse-vmemmap Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/13] memory-hotplug : free memmap " Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 5:06 ` Wen Congyang [this message]
2012-07-11 5:52 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 6:25 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-11 6:48 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 7:27 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-09 10:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/13] memory-hotplug : add node_device_release Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/13] memory-hotplug : remove sysfs file of node Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/13] memory-hotplug : hot-remove physical memory Christoph Lameter
2012-07-10 9:58 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-10 16:50 ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-11 0:09 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 0:21 ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-11 0:54 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 14:24 ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-11 1:52 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-11 2:24 ` Wen Congyang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFD09D5.8010605@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).