linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: len.brown@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	paulus@samba.org, minchan.kim@gmail.com,
	kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, rientjes@google.com,
	cl@linux.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, liuj97@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 11/13] memory-hotplug : free memmap of sparse-vmemmap
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:06:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFD09D5.8010605@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFAB37F.1060105@jp.fujitsu.com>

At 07/09/2012 06:33 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
> I don't think that all pages of virtual mapping in removed memory can be
> freed, since page which type is MIX_SECTION_INFO is difficult to free.
> So, the patch only frees page which type is SECTION_INFO at first.
> 
> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c |   91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mm.h    |    2 +
>  mm/memory_hotplug.c   |    5 ++
>  mm/sparse.c           |    5 +-
>  4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-3.5-rc4/include/linux/mm.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.5-rc4.orig/include/linux/mm.h	2012-07-03 14:22:18.530011567 +0900
> +++ linux-3.5-rc4/include/linux/mm.h	2012-07-03 14:22:20.999983872 +0900
> @@ -1588,6 +1588,8 @@ int vmemmap_populate(struct page *start_
>  void vmemmap_populate_print_last(void);
>  void register_page_bootmem_memmap(unsigned long section_nr, struct page *map,
>  				  unsigned long size);
> +void vmemmap_kfree(struct page *memmpa, unsigned long nr_pages);
> +void vmemmap_free_bootmem(struct page *memmpa, unsigned long nr_pages);
> 
>  enum mf_flags {
>  	MF_COUNT_INCREASED = 1 << 0,
> Index: linux-3.5-rc4/mm/sparse.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.5-rc4.orig/mm/sparse.c	2012-07-03 14:21:45.071429805 +0900
> +++ linux-3.5-rc4/mm/sparse.c	2012-07-03 14:22:21.000983767 +0900
> @@ -614,12 +614,13 @@ static inline struct page *kmalloc_secti
>  	/* This will make the necessary allocations eventually. */
>  	return sparse_mem_map_populate(pnum, nid);
>  }
> -static void __kfree_section_memmap(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +static void __kfree_section_memmap(struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages)
>  {
> -	return; /* XXX: Not implemented yet */
> +	vmemmap_kfree(page, nr_pages);

Hmm, I think you try to free the memory allocated in kmalloc_section_memmap().

>  }
>  static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages)
>  {
> +	vmemmap_free_bootmem(page, nr_pages);
>  }

Hmm, which function is the memory you try to free allocated in?

>  #else
>  static struct page *__kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long nr_pages)
> Index: linux-3.5-rc4/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.5-rc4.orig/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c	2012-07-03 14:22:18.538011465 +0900
> +++ linux-3.5-rc4/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c	2012-07-03 14:22:21.007983103 +0900
> @@ -978,6 +978,97 @@ vmemmap_populate(struct page *start_page
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +unsigned long find_and_clear_pte_page(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> +				      struct page **pp)
> +{
> +	pgd_t *pgd;
> +	pud_t *pud;
> +	pmd_t *pmd;
> +	pte_t *pte;
> +	unsigned long next;
> +
> +	*pp = NULL;
> +
> +	pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
> +	if (pgd_none(*pgd))
> +		return (addr + PAGE_SIZE) & PAGE_MASK;

Hmm, why not goto next pgd?

> +
> +	pud = pud_offset(pgd, addr);
> +	if (pud_none(*pud))
> +		return (addr + PAGE_SIZE) & PAGE_MASK;
> +
> +	if (!cpu_has_pse) {
> +		next = (addr + PAGE_SIZE) & PAGE_MASK;
> +		pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> +		if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> +			return next;
> +
> +		pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
> +		if (pte_none(*pte))
> +			return next;
> +
> +		*pp = pte_page(*pte);
> +		pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);

I think you should flush tlb here.

> +	} else {
> +		next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> +
> +		pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> +		if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> +			return next;
> +
> +		*pp = pmd_page(*pmd);
> +		pmd_clear(pmd);
> +	}
> +
> +	return next;
> +}
> +
> +void __meminit
> +vmemmap_kfree(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> +	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)memmap;
> +	unsigned long end = (unsigned long)(memmap + nr_pages);
> +	unsigned long next;
> +	unsigned int order;
> +	struct page *page;
> +
> +	for (; addr < end; addr = next) {
> +		page = NULL;
> +		next = find_and_clear_pte_page(addr, end, &page);
> +		if (!page)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (is_vmalloc_addr(page_address(page)))
> +			vfree(page_address(page));

Hmm, the memory is allocated in vmemmap_alloc_block(), and the address
can not be vmalloc address.

> +		else {
> +			order = next - addr;
> +			free_pages((unsigned long)page_address(page),
> +				   get_order(order));

OOPS. I think we cannot free pages here.

sizeof(struct page) is less than PAGE_SIZE. We store more than one struct
page in the same page. If you free it here while the other struct page
is in use, it is very dangerous.

> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void __meminit
> +vmemmap_free_bootmem(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> +	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)memmap;
> +	unsigned long end = (unsigned long)(memmap + nr_pages);
> +	unsigned long next;
> +	struct page *page;
> +	unsigned long magic;
> +
> +	for (; addr < end; addr = next) {
> +		page = NULL;
> +		next = find_and_clear_pte_page(addr, end, &page);
> +		if (!page)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
> +		if (magic == SECTION_INFO)
> +			put_page_bootmem(page);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  void __meminit
>  register_page_bootmem_memmap(unsigned long section_nr, struct page *start_page,
>  			     unsigned long size)
> Index: linux-3.5-rc4/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.5-rc4.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c	2012-07-03 14:22:18.522011667 +0900
> +++ linux-3.5-rc4/mm/memory_hotplug.c	2012-07-03 14:22:21.012982694 +0900
> @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ static int __meminit __add_section(int n
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP

I think this line can be removed now.

Thanks
Wen Congyang

>  static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
>  {
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct pglist_data *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
>  	int ret;
> 
>  	if (!valid_section(ms))
> @@ -310,6 +312,9 @@ static int __remove_section(struct zone
> 
>  	ret = unregister_memory_section(ms);
> 
> +	pgdat_resize_lock(pgdat, &flags);
> +	sparse_remove_one_section(zone, ms);
> +	pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  #else
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-11  5:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-09 10:21 [RFC PATCH v3 0/13] memory-hotplug : hot-remove physical memory Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/13] memory-hotplug : rename remove_memory to offline_memory Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/13] memory-hotplug : add physical memory hotplug code to acpi_memory_device_remove Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13  3:26   ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17  0:46     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13  3:35   ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17  1:44     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-17  1:54       ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-17  2:32         ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17  3:08           ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-17  3:32             ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17  4:51               ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-17  5:17                 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17  5:19                   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13 10:40   ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17  1:10     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/13] memory-hotplug : unify argument of firmware_map_add_early/hotplug Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 15:30   ` Dave Hansen
2012-07-12  4:52     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-12 13:40       ` Dave Hansen
2012-07-13  4:34         ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13  5:11         ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/13] memory-hotplug : remove /sys/firmware/memmap/X sysfs Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13  9:10   ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17  0:28     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-16  2:32   ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17  0:30     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/13] memory-hotplug : does not release memory region in PAGES_PER_SECTION chunks Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13  3:42   ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-09 10:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/13] memory-hotplug : add memory_block_release Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/13] memory-hotplug : remove_memory calls __remove_pages Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v3 8/13] memory-hotplug : check page type in get_page_bootmem Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 9/13] memory-hotplug : move register_page_bootmem_info_node and put_page_bootmem for sparse-vmemmap Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:32 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/13] memory-hotplug : implement register_page_bootmem_info_section of sparse-vmemmap Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/13] memory-hotplug : free memmap " Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11  5:06   ` Wen Congyang [this message]
2012-07-11  5:52     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11  6:25       ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-11  6:48         ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11  7:27           ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-09 10:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/13] memory-hotplug : add node_device_release Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/13] memory-hotplug : remove sysfs file of node Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/13] memory-hotplug : hot-remove physical memory Christoph Lameter
2012-07-10  9:58   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-10 16:50     ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-11  0:09       ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11  0:21         ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-11  0:54           ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 14:24             ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-11  1:52 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-11  2:24   ` Wen Congyang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FFD09D5.8010605@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).