On 11/13/06, Kim Phillips < kim.phillips@freescale.com> wrote:

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:47:29 -0700
"Grant Likely" < grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:

>
> This document specifies the requirements on the device-tree for mpc52xx
> based boards. These requirements are above and beyond the details
> specified in the booting-without-of.txt document.

well, the definition of the compatible property has a different bias. I'm not saying the definition in booting-without-of is necessarily better (I know the document is too linux- and freescale-specific in places), I'm just saying that this document has good ideas, but is creating an unnecessary diversion, and amending booting-without-of would help maintain consistency with other platforms' efforts.

Kim
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev