Re: [PATCH] Add USB support to mpc8349-mitx board port

["John Rigby" <jcrigby@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 920 bytes --]

I'm just saying that an argument can be made that having all the OF to
non-OF
glue in one place is better than having dual bindings in every driver.

If you count ugliness in terms of file count the fsl_soc.c solution
gets a score of 1 and the dual binding solution gets an score of N.
Where N is the number of drivers.

John

On 7/9/07, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>
> On 7/8/07, John Rigby <jcrigby@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I see your point, I agree the two layers of glue is bad.  But this means
> > the double code is spread across many drivers instead of being in one
> > place (fsl_soc.c).
>
> ???  I don't understand what you mean.  Are you saying that it's
> better to have all the OF bindings in one place (fsl_soc.c) instead of
> with each individual driver?
>
> Cheers,
> g.
>
>
> --
> Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
> Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
> grant.likely@secretlab.ca
> (403) 399-0195
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1388 bytes --]