From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.171]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DC2DE128 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:29:18 +1000 (EST) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so276995wfg.15 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4b73d43f0806180629o5d85d0b0yf48018088e728975@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:29:17 -0600 From: "John Rigby" To: "Grant Likely" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs_enet: fix checkpatch.pl problems In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_708_19955640.1213795757453" References: <1213743794-3537-1-git-send-email-jrigby@freescale.com> <1213743794-3537-2-git-send-email-jrigby@freescale.com> Cc: Scott Wood , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Sam Ravnborg , jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , ------=_Part_708_19955640.1213795757453 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I agree, I'll separate the fec_t -> struct fec changes out. On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:03 PM, John Rigby wrote: > > Fixed all errors and warnings that checkpatch.pl > > reports if this was a new submission. > > Also changed instances of fec_t to struct fec in > > mac-fec.c and mii-fec.c. > > Nit: checkpatch is not law; particularly in the case of whitespace > change. Personally, I think cleaning up whitespace in this regard > causes more problems than it solves. Plus, it makes the important > change (fec_t -> struct fec) get lost in a see of unimportant ones > which makes for hard reviewing. > > But I must sleep now; I'll review your other patch tomorrow. > > Cheers, > g. > > -- > Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. > Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev > ------=_Part_708_19955640.1213795757453 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I agree, I'll separate the fec_t -> struct fec changes out.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:03 PM, John Rigby <jrigby@freescale.com> wrote:
> Fixed all errors and warnings that checkpatch.pl
> reports if this was a new submission.
> Also changed instances of fec_t to struct fec in
> mac-fec.c and mii-fec.c.

Nit: checkpatch is not law; particularly in the case of whitespace
change.  Personally, I think cleaning up whitespace in this regard
causes more problems than it solves.  Plus, it makes the important
change (fec_t -> struct fec) get lost in a see of unimportant ones
which makes for hard reviewing.

But I must sleep now; I'll review your other patch tomorrow.

Cheers,
g.

--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

------=_Part_708_19955640.1213795757453--