From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.227]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D161DDDE04 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:40:58 +1000 (EST) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so293872rvb.9 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4b73d43f0806262040s7993dcb7vd8a3d05793ea8a7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:40:57 -0600 From: "John Rigby" To: "John Rigby" , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [Resend][PATCH 1/8][Version 2] MPC5121 Update MPC5121ADS device tree In-Reply-To: <20080627014233.GB17621@yookeroo.seuss> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <20080625203051.4FE882F123B@rumpole.eng.lineo.com> <20080627014233.GB17621@yookeroo.seuss> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Because get_immrbase in fsl_soc.c does not work without it. On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:42 PM, David Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:24:46PM -0600, John Rigby wrote: >> Updated device tree for MPC5121ADS > > [snip] >> soc@80000000 { >> compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-immr"; >> + device_type = "soc"; > > I realise we still need the unwanted device_type value on the soc in > some cases for backwards compatibility, but why are you adding it > where it wasn't before..? > > -- > David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code > david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ > | _way_ _around_! > http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev >