patches for 2.6.27...

patches for 2.6.27...

[Kumar Gala]

Please point out any patches that have been posted but havent made it  
into a git tree related to Freescale chips.

I know there are probably a slew of CPM patches that need to get into  
the tree.

- k

Re: patches for 2.6.27...

[Laurent Pinchart]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1208 bytes --]

Hi Kumar,

On Wednesday 02 July 2008, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Please point out any patches that have been posted but havent made it  
> into a git tree related to Freescale chips.
> 
> I know there are probably a slew of CPM patches that need to get into  
> the tree.

Here are 5 patches that I'd like to see in 2.6.27. They haven't made into any git tree as far as I know.

[PATCHv2] fs_enet: restore promiscuous and multicast settings in restart()
        http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=968&id=19228
[PATCH 2/2] fs_enet: MDIO on GPIO support
        http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=968&id=18693
[PATCHv3 1/2] [POWERPC] CPM2: Implement GPIO LIB API on CPM2 Freescale SoC.
        http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=968&id=19045
[PATCH] powerpc: Modem control lines support for the cpm_uart driver
        http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=968&id=17928
[PATCH] cpm_uart: Support uart_wait_until_sent()
        http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=968&id=19233

-- 
Laurent Pinchart
CSE Semaphore Belgium

Chaussee de Bruxelles, 732A
B-1410 Waterloo
Belgium

T +32 (2) 387 42 59
F +32 (2) 387 42 75

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: patches for 2.6.27...

[Scott Wood]

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 02:56:16AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Please point out any patches that have been posted but havent made it  
> into a git tree related to Freescale chips.
> 
> I know there are probably a slew of CPM patches that need to get into  
> the tree.

Could you apply the 83xx power management patchset (the gianfar bits had
been acked by Jeff long ago)?

-Scott

Re: patches for 2.6.27...

[Kim Phillips]

On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 02:56:16 -0500
Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

> Please point out any patches that have been posted but havent made it  
> into a git tree related to Freescale chips.

I haven't heard back from Segher, so:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=19313

Kim

Re: patches for 2.6.27...

[Dave Jiang]

Kumar Gala wrote:
> Please point out any patches that have been posted but havent made it 
> into a git tree related to Freescale chips.
> 
> I know there are probably a slew of CPM patches that need to get into 
> the tree.
> 
> - k
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Kumar can you put this one in please? Thanks!

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?q=Dave%20Jiang&id=19008

-- 

------------------------------------------------------
Dave Jiang
Software Engineer
MontaVista Software, Inc.
http://www.mvista.com
------------------------------------------------------

Re: patches for 2.6.27...

[Kumar Gala]

On Jul 2, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Phil Terry wrote:

> On Wednesday 02 July 2008 12:56:16 am Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Please point out any patches that have been posted but havent made it
>> into a git tree related to Freescale chips.
>>
> What has happened to the RapidIO patches? I saw a bunch in march but  
> don't
> know where they've gone officially. There was talk they missed 25,  
> the of
> documentation would be fixed in 26 and maybe they would make 27?  
> Where are
> they in the process of propagating the galak tree, the paulas tree,  
> and the
> linus tree.
> This was one of them
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?q=rapidio&id=17270
>
> Cheers
> Phil

These should already be in 2.6.26.

- k

Re: patches for 2.6.27...

[Anton Vorontsov]

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 02:56:16AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Please point out any patches that have been posted but havent made it  
> into a git tree related to Freescale chips.

How about RTC work for MPC8610HPCD/MPC8572DS:

[PATCH 1/4] powerpc: fsl_uli1575: fix RTC quirk to work on MPC8572DS and MPC8610HPCD
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=18913

[PATCH 2/4] powerpc/85xx/86xx: some refactoring for fsl_uli1575 code
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=18914

[PATCH 3/4] powerpc: rtc_cmos_setup: assign interrupts only if there is i8259 PIC
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=18915

[PATCH 4/4] powerpc/86xx: mpc8610_hpcd: add support for ULI RTC
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=18916


And mpc83xx_defconfig update for MPC8360E-RDK:

[PATCH v3] powerpc/83xx: update mpc83xx_defconfig to support MPC8360E-RDK
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=18903

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

Re: patches for 2.6.27...

[Segher Boessenkool]

>> Please point out any patches that have been posted but havent made it
>> into a git tree related to Freescale chips.
>
> I haven't heard back from Segher, so:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=19313

You haven't heard back because I feel like I'm talking to a wall.

The "compatible" definition for this node needs to be fixed.


Segher

Re: patches for 2.6.27...

[Vitaly Bordug]

В Wed, 2 Jul 2008 10:36:43 +0200
Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> пишет:

> Hi Kumar,
> 
> On Wednesday 02 July 2008, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Please point out any patches that have been posted but havent made
> > it into a git tree related to Freescale chips.
> > 
> > I know there are probably a slew of CPM patches that need to get
> > into the tree.
> 
> Here are 5 patches that I'd like to see in 2.6.27. They haven't made
> into any git tree as far as I know.
> 
> [PATCHv2] fs_enet: restore promiscuous and multicast settings in
> restart()
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=968&id=19228 [PATCH
> 2/2] fs_enet: MDIO on GPIO support

This has been merged per email from Jeff.

> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=968&id=18693
> [PATCHv3 1/2] [POWERPC] CPM2: Implement GPIO LIB API on CPM2
> Freescale SoC.

> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=968&id=19045
> [PATCH] powerpc: Modem control lines support for the cpm_uart driver
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=968&id=17928

Seems to be missing and I'd second adding this and will add my ACK if
it will help getting those upstream.

> [PATCH] cpm_uart: Support uart_wait_until_sent()
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=968&id=19233
> 
This seems to be applied to Kumar's tree per email from him.

Re: patches for 2.6.27...

[John Rigby]

Two pci patches that are prereq's for 5121 pci:


http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=518&id=19299
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=518&id=19300

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> Please point out any patches that have been posted but havent made it into a
> git tree related to Freescale chips.
>
> I know there are probably a slew of CPM patches that need to get into the
> tree.
>
> - k
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>