From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEE2C43387 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 934F320659 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:56:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 934F320659 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43dh3x1LTbzDqXg for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 04:56:29 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=joe.lawrence@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43dh294tJszDqWF for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 04:54:56 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76CD38667A; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.18.17.208] (dhcp-17-208.bos.redhat.com [10.18.17.208]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 836465FCCE; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: ppc64le reliable stack unwinder and scheduled tasks To: Josh Poimboeuf References: <7f468285-b149-37e2-e782-c9e538b997a9@redhat.com> <87bm4ocbbt.fsf@suse.de> <20190111010808.GA17858@redhat.com> <87fttzbpid.fsf@suse.de> <20190114040937.GA6739@redhat.com> <877ef7bt6j.fsf@suse.de> <20190114164659.GA18643@redhat.com> <20190114170932.awhuv7livfxhrcee@treble> From: Joe Lawrence Message-ID: <4b95b2f3-c5e8-4d21-88fe-9de6cd346954@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:54:52 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190114170932.awhuv7livfxhrcee@treble> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:54:54 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nicolai Stange , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Torsten Duwe , Jiri Kosina , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 1/14/19 12:09 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 11:46:59AM -0500, Joe Lawrence wrote: >> @@ -158,11 +158,21 @@ save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(struct task_struct *tsk, >> return 1; /* invalid backlink, too far up. */ >> } >> >> + /* We can only trust the bottom frame's backlink, the rest >> + * of the frame may be uninitialized, continue to the next. */ >> + if (firstframe--) >> + goto next; > > Won't this decrement firstframe on every iteration, so when firstframe > is 0, it will decrement it to -1, causing it to 'goto next' on all > future iterations? > Argg, yes, that should be: if (!firstframe) { firstframe = 0; goto next; } Apologies for the monday-morning crap-patch. /runsoff to find some more caffeine -- Joe