From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sipsolutions.net (xc.sipsolutions.net [83.246.72.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C157DDDEE for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:46:08 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4bd87c33b7df6b3726a9526f15b87aa2.squirrel@secure.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1225298044.3546.414.camel@thor.sulgenrain.local> References: <1225246284.1369.31.camel@johannes.berg> <1225282185.3546.376.camel@thor.sulgenrain.local> <1225282379.5439.11.camel@johannes.berg> <1225298044.3546.414.camel@thor.sulgenrain.local> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:45:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH] uninorth agp: don't mark module parameter __devinit From: "Johannes Berg" To: Michel =?iso-8859-15?Q?D=E4nzer?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-15 Cc: linuxppc-dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Michel Dänzer wrote: >> Can uninorth_fetch_size be marked __devinit then? > > I'm not sure, and none of the other AGP backend drivers seems to do > so... Well, either it can, or marking "aperture" is wrong, no? johannes