From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 429nl71VdczF2X0 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 15:48:51 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: <4bfd06d41f21f6e3a57ce20e3ce155f6545a1ac3.camel@neuling.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: Avoid code patching freed init sections From: Michael Neuling To: Christophe LEROY , Tyrel Datwyler , mpe@ellerman.id.au Cc: Michal =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Such=E1nek?= , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Haren Myneni , Nicholas Piggin Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 15:48:50 +1000 In-Reply-To: <7d32de2e-b390-527d-cd5c-2c5eacc19a2c@c-s.fr> References: <20180912052058.10062-1-mikey@neuling.org> <0922624b-6c6f-1afd-a9e2-cde5a9a8a1e4@c-s.fr> <29d3467a9314f5b80f93d241ae2566c48b546bfe.camel@neuling.org> <7d32de2e-b390-527d-cd5c-2c5eacc19a2c@c-s.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 07:38 +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote: >=20 > Le 13/09/2018 =C3=A0 03:21, Tyrel Datwyler a =C3=A9crit : > > On 09/12/2018 05:36 PM, Michael Neuling wrote: > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > > + (unsigned long)patch_addr); > > > >=20 > > > > Please align second line as per Codying style. > > >=20 > > > Sorry I can't see what's wrong. You're (or Cody :-P) going to have to > > > spell it > > > this out for me... > >=20 > > I suspect that the suggestion is the opening parenthesis of "(unsigned > > long)" should sit directly under the "K" of "KERN_DEBUG". I'm pretty su= re > > Documentation/process/coding-style.rst is very adamant that all identat= ion > > is always 8 characters and spaces should never be used, but there still > > seems to be a lot of places/suggestions that argument lists that spill = over > > multiple lines should be space indented to align with the very first > > argument at the top level. So, I guess I'm not sure what the desire is = here. > > Although moving to pr_debug might fit it to a single line anyways. ;) >=20 > It is exactly that, as reported by checkpatch, look at=20 > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/968850/ Sweet... looks like v3 is clean https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/969241/ Mikey