From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
npiggin@gmail.com, chleroy@kernel.org, gjoyce@ibm.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pci: Initialize msi_addr_mask for OF-created PCI devices
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 23:06:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4eaa7872-6bae-4419-9281-203c04f1996d@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219173149.GA3486808@bhelgaas>
On 2/19/26 11:01 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc sparc folks, PCI enumeration via OF likely broken]
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 11:15:26PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
>> Recent changes [1] replaced the use of no_64bit_msi with msi_addr_mask.
>> As a result, msi_addr_mask is now expected to be initialized to
>> DMA_BIT_MASK(64) when a pci_dev is set up. However, this initialization
>> was missed on powerpc due to differences in the device initialization
>> path compared to other architectures. Due to this, now pci device probe
>> method fails on powerpc system.
>
> s/pci/PCI/ to match below.
Ack
>
>> On powerpc systems, struct pci_dev instances are created from device
>> tree nodes via of_create_pci_dev(). Because msi_addr_mask was not
>> initialized there, it remained zero. Later, during MSI setup,
>> msi_verify_entries() validates the programmed MSI address against
>> pdev->msi_addr_mask. Since the mask was not set correctly, the
>> validation fails, causing PCI driver probe failures for devices on
>> powerpc systems.
>>
>> Initialize pdev->msi_addr_mask to DMA_BIT_MASK(64) in
>> of_create_pci_dev() so that MSI address validation succeeds and device
>> probe works as expected.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260129-pci-msi-addr-mask-v4-0-70da998f2750@iscas.ac.cn/
>>
>> Fixes: 386ced19e9a3 ("PCI/MSI: Convert the boolean no_64bit_msi flag to a DMA address mask")
>> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Looks like this and a similar sparc fix need to be in v7.0. Would be
> great if they could make v7.0-rc1 (Sunday), but that's pretty close.
>
> Thomas, you merged 386ced19e9a3. I'm happy to merge the powerpc and
> sparc fixes, given acks from you and the powerpc & sparc folks, or
> feel free to take them yourself.
>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
>> index 756043dd06e9..26ec97ce6b40 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
>> @@ -211,6 +211,12 @@ struct pci_dev *of_create_pci_dev(struct device_node *node,
>> dev->current_state = PCI_UNKNOWN; /* unknown power state */
>> dev->error_state = pci_channel_io_normal;
>> dev->dma_mask = 0xffffffff;
>
> It's typical to add a blank line between the code above and the
> comment below, as was done in 386ced19e9a3.
Okay will fix this in v2.
>
>> + /*
>> + * Assume 64-bit addresses for MSI initially. Will be changed to 32-bit
>> + * if MSI (rather than MSI-X) capability does not have
>> + * PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT. Can also be overridden by driver.
>> + */
>> + dev->msi_addr_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
>>
>> /* Early fixups, before probing the BARs */
>> pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_early, dev);
>> --
>> 2.52.0
>>
Thanks,
--Nilay
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-17 17:45 [PATCH] powerpc/pci: Initialize msi_addr_mask for OF-created PCI devices Nilay Shroff
2026-02-19 7:22 ` Vivian Wang
2026-02-19 17:32 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-02-19 17:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-02-19 17:36 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4eaa7872-6bae-4419-9281-203c04f1996d@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox