From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD25C433E1 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 22:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A531220714 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 22:01:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="SDqTC81G"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="SDqTC81G" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A531220714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCR9j39pXzDrdX for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:01:13 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=207.211.31.81; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com; envelope-from=longman@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=SDqTC81G; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=SDqTC81G; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BCR741JGJzDrK5 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:58:55 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1595541532; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=T3T05BblW5qcrnE9EzvsH5COWPH3G8n5S+3dyvDj4j8=; b=SDqTC81GNcPZ44vKLAlYZJdE6NGWxCHtbQrn3KgfYiafGtnssxGH7vJC35duf8iiYU80fo kNnqqqkkf8XrwARrYbQiJeZcei2a0DahWMTCnpIIGUjQkr0edvRKgPyGVo/VcA5D7geKTf 5tpIvIf/jJoeLZNxRJA19ppptc9G7hY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1595541532; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=T3T05BblW5qcrnE9EzvsH5COWPH3G8n5S+3dyvDj4j8=; b=SDqTC81GNcPZ44vKLAlYZJdE6NGWxCHtbQrn3KgfYiafGtnssxGH7vJC35duf8iiYU80fo kNnqqqkkf8XrwARrYbQiJeZcei2a0DahWMTCnpIIGUjQkr0edvRKgPyGVo/VcA5D7geKTf 5tpIvIf/jJoeLZNxRJA19ppptc9G7hY= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-309-1wwkHWrOOpOP_vwI3YSGQw-1; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:58:47 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 1wwkHWrOOpOP_vwI3YSGQw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6195D80183C; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 21:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from llong.remote.csb (ovpn-119-128.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.119.128]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E245C1D3; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 21:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt qspinlocks for SPLPAR To: peterz@infradead.org References: <20200706043540.1563616-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20200706043540.1563616-6-npiggin@gmail.com> <874kqhvu1v.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <8265d782-4e50-a9b2-a908-0cb588ffa09c@redhat.com> <20200723140011.GR5523@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <845de183-56f5-2958-3159-faa131d46401@redhat.com> <20200723184759.GS119549@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <6d6279ad-7432-63c1-14c3-18c4cff30bf8@redhat.com> <20200723195855.GU119549@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Waiman Long Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: <4fbe47a5-dbc9-427a-5b21-b31b37bc751a@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:58:43 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200723195855.GU119549@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Boqun Feng , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Nicholas Piggin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 7/23/20 3:58 PM, peterz@infradead.org wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 03:04:13PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> On 7/23/20 2:47 PM, peterz@infradead.org wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:32:36PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >>>> BTW, do you have any comment on my v2 lock holder cpu info qspinlock patch? >>>> I will have to update the patch to fix the reported 0-day test problem, but >>>> I want to collect other feedback before sending out v3. >>> I want to say I hate it all, it adds instructions to a path we spend an >>> aweful lot of time optimizing without really getting anything back for >>> it. >> It does add some extra instruction that may slow it down slightly, but I >> don't agree that it gives nothing back. The cpu lock holder information can >> be useful in analyzing crash dumps and in some debugging situation. I think >> it can be useful in RHEL for this readon. How about an x86 config option to >> allow distros to decide if they want to have it enabled? I will make sure >> that it will have no performance degradation if the option is not enabled. > Config knobs suck too; they create a maintenance burden (we get to make > sure all the permutations works/build/etc..) and effectively nobody uses > them, since world+dog uses what distros pick. > > Anyway, instead of adding a second per-cpu variable, can you see how > horrible something like this is: > > unsigned char adds(unsigned char var, unsigned char val) > { > unsigned short sat = 0xff, tmp = var; > > asm ("addb %[val], %b[var];" > "cmovc %[sat], %[var];" > : [var] "+r" (tmp) > : [val] "ir" (val), [sat] "r" (sat) > ); > > return tmp; > } > > Another thing to try is, instead of threading that lockval throughout > the thing, simply: > > #define _Q_LOCKED_VAL this_cpu_read_stable(cpu_sat) > > or combined with the above > > #define _Q_LOCKED_VAL adds(this_cpu_read_stable(cpu_number), 2) > > and see if the compiler really makes a mess of things. > Thanks for the suggestion. I will try that out. Cheers, Longman