linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugene Surovegin <ebs@ebshome.net>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
Cc: Bret Indrelee <Bret.Indrelee@qlogic.com>,
	Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Linux PPC Embedded mailing list
	<linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: Any restrictions on DMA address boundry?
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:54:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20030925134712.03b0ef78@mail.ebshome.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52k77wk9mj.fsf@topspin.com>


At 11:26 AM 9/25/2003, Roland Dreier wrote:
>People often come up with complicated schemes like flushing and
>invalidating the cache before and after the DMA transfer, but there's
>always a scenario where the DMA buffer and/or the unrelated data get
>corrupted.  The only solution is to make sure that you don't put
>unrelated data in the same cache line as a DMA buffer.

Well, I'm one of those strange people.
Actually, those schemes are quite trivial and they help in _real_ life.

I fully understand that they are not 100% foolproof, but I think they are
_better_ than doing _nothing_.
I already _wasted_ a lot of my time debugging cache coherency problems.

I cannot audit _all_ drivers/subsystems I use nor I can force their authors
do this.

Eugene.


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-25 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-22 15:13 Any restrictions on DMA address boundry? Bret Indrelee
2003-09-22 16:59 ` Matt Porter
2003-09-25 17:56   ` Roland Dreier
2003-09-25 18:15     ` Bret Indrelee
2003-09-25 18:26       ` Roland Dreier
2003-09-25 20:54         ` Eugene Surovegin [this message]
2003-09-25 19:56       ` Matt Porter
2003-09-25 20:20         ` Bret Indrelee
2003-09-25 20:55           ` Matt Porter
2003-09-25 21:27             ` Bret Indrelee
2003-09-25 20:25         ` Eugene Surovegin
2003-09-25 20:32           ` Bret Indrelee
2003-09-25 20:57             ` Matt Porter
2003-09-25 20:41           ` Matt Porter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5.1.0.14.2.20030925134712.03b0ef78@mail.ebshome.net \
    --to=ebs@ebshome.net \
    --cc=Bret.Indrelee@qlogic.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=roland@topspin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).