From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] PCI: Add PCI_DEV_FLAGS_USE_NON_MSI_INTX_IRQ to enable non MSI/INTx interrupt
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:47:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50043790.6090605@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342409487-28256-1-git-send-email-Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com>
On 07/15/2012 10:31 PM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> On some platforms, in RC mode, root port has neither MSI/MSI-X nor INTx
> interrupt generated, which are available only in EP mode on those platform.
> In this case, we try to use other interrupt for port service driver to have
> AER, Hot-plug, etc, services to work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com>
> ---
> v2: separated platform-specific part to arch/powerpc/sysdev.
>
> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 10 ++++++++--
> drivers/pci/quirks.c | 9 +++++++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> index 75915b3..837ad15 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> @@ -212,8 +212,14 @@ static int init_service_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int *irqs, int mask)
> if (!pcie_port_enable_msix(dev, irqs, mask))
> return 0;
>
> - /* We're not going to use MSI-X, so try MSI and fall back to INTx */
> - if (!pci_enable_msi(dev) || dev->pin)
> + /*
> + * We're not going to use MSI-X, so try MSI and fall back to INTx.
> + * Eventually, if neither MSI/MSI-X nor INTx available, try other
> + * interrupt. (On some platforms, root port doesn't support generating
> + * MSI/MSI-X/INTx in RC mode)
> + */
> + if (!pci_enable_msi(dev) || dev->pin || ((dev->dev_flags &
> + PCI_DEV_FLAGS_USE_NON_MSI_INTX_IRQ) && dev->irq))
> irq = dev->irq;
I didn't see a response on the question about what would happen if we
did this unconditionally (i.e. just s/dev->pin/dev->irq/ in the original
code). We should avoid introducing flags like this unless there's a
good reason.
Maybe submit a patch that does it unconditionally, and see if that draws
a complaint.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-16 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-16 3:31 [PATCH 1/2 v2] PCI: Add PCI_DEV_FLAGS_USE_NON_MSI_INTX_IRQ to enable non MSI/INTx interrupt Shengzhou Liu
2012-07-16 3:31 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] powerpc/fsl: PCI: add quirk_enable_non_msi_intx_interrupt Shengzhou Liu
2012-07-16 15:47 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2012-07-17 3:01 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] PCI: Add PCI_DEV_FLAGS_USE_NON_MSI_INTX_IRQ to enable non MSI/INTx interrupt Liu Shengzhou-B36685
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50043790.6090605@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).