From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e32.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 183CF2C0096 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 02:21:09 +1000 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e32.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:21:06 -0600 Received: from d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.226]) by d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082B91FF0023 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:21:00 +0000 (WET) Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (d03av06.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.245]) by d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q6VGKhrb138768 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:20:44 -0600 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q6VGLWKZ021288 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:21:33 -0600 Message-ID: <501805C3.7030504@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:20:19 -0500 From: Brian King MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi/ibmvscsi: add module alias for ibmvscsic References: <1342630158-16510-1-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <1343611946.21647.23.camel@pasglop> <20120730190606.GD3155@aepfle.de> <1343704122.8227.3.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1343704122.8227.3.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Olaf Hering , Brian J King , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Robert C Jennings List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 07/30/2012 10:08 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 21:06 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: >>> So while this would work, I do wonder however whether we could >> instead >>> fix it by simplifying the whole thing as follow since iSeries is now >>> gone and so we don't need split backends anymore: >>> >>> scsi/ibmvscsi: Remove backend abstraction >> >> I cant that these things myself anymore. > > Brian, can somebody from your side own these ? I talked to Rob and he will be picking this up. Rob - can you submit a patch to the maintainers file, adding yourself as the ibmvscsi maintainer? Thanks, Brian -- Brian King Power Linux I/O IBM Linux Technology Center