From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E8972C0086 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:31:36 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <502BDCEE.70007@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:31:26 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jia Hongtao Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/3] powerpc/ge_imp3a: Add ISA node to PCI primary bus References: <1345021026-10886-1-git-send-email-B38951@freescale.com> <1345021026-10886-3-git-send-email-B38951@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <1345021026-10886-3-git-send-email-B38951@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, B07421@freescale.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08/15/2012 03:57 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote: > PCI primary bus will be determined by looking for ISA node in device tree. > Also for board ge_imp3a primary bus is the second PCI controller detected. > So we add ISA node to ge_imp3a's device tree to fit the new determination. > > Adding ISA node to other boards' device tree is not necessary. The situation > that the first bus is primary have already been handled. Please refer to the > following patch: > powerpc/pci: Make sure ISA IO base is not zero > > Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao > Signed-off-by: Li Yang > --- > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/ge_imp3a.dts | 4 ++++ > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/ge_imp3a.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/ge_imp3a.dts > index fefae41..aa2c4b5 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/ge_imp3a.dts > +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/ge_imp3a.dts > @@ -248,6 +248,10 @@ > 0x1000000 0x0 0x0 > 0x1000000 0x0 0x0 > 0x0 0x10000>; > + > + isa@1e { > + device_type = "isa"; > + }; > }; > }; > }; I believe I already said it's not acceptable to break old device trees. -Scott