From: leroy christophe <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Powerpc 8xx CPM_UART delay in receive
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:16:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <502CF2A0.8080109@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120814155227.018988da@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Le 14/08/2012 16:52, Alan Cox a écrit :
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:26:28 +0200
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm not sure who to address this Patch to either
>>
>> It fixes a delay issue with CPM UART driver on Powerpc MPC8xx.
>> The problem is that with the actual code, the driver waits 32 IDLE patterns before returning the received data to the upper level. It means for instance about 1 second at 300 bauds.
>> This fix limits to one byte the waiting period.
> Take a look how the 8250 does it - I think you want to set the value
> based upon the data rate. Your patch will break it for everyone doing
> high seed I/O.
>
> Alan
>
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. As far as I can see 8250/16550
is working a bit different, as it is based on a fifo and triggers an
interrupt as soon as a given number of bytes is received. I also see
that in case this amount is not reached, there is a receive-timeout
which goes on after no byte is received for a duration of more than 4 bytes.
The PowerPC CPM is working differently. It doesn't use a fifo but
buffers. Buffers are handed to the microprocessor only when they are
full or after a timeout period which is adjustable. In the driver, the
buffers are configured with a size of 32 bytes. And the timeout is set
to the size of the buffer. That is this timeout that I'm reducing to 1
byte in my proposed patch. I can't see what it would break for high
speed I/O.
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-16 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-14 14:26 [PATCH] Powerpc 8xx CPM_UART delay in receive Christophe Leroy
2012-08-14 14:52 ` Alan Cox
2012-08-16 13:16 ` leroy christophe [this message]
2012-08-16 14:29 ` Alan Cox
2012-08-16 14:35 ` leroy christophe
2012-08-16 15:21 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-10 7:09 ` leroy christophe
2012-09-10 13:10 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=502CF2A0.8080109@c-s.fr \
--to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=marcelo@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).