From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40Hb1c6JzPzF1sl for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 20:05:49 +1000 (AEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm64: entry: isb in el1_irq To: Yury Norov Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , Chris Metcalf , Christopher Lameter , Russell King - ARM Linux , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Catalin Marinas , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Alexey Klimov , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180405171800.5648-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> <20180405171800.5648-2-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> From: James Morse Message-ID: <5036b99a-9faa-c220-27dd-e0d73f8b3fc7@arm.com> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 11:02:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180405171800.5648-2-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Yury, On 05/04/18 18:17, Yury Norov wrote: > Kernel text patching framework relies on IPI to ensure that other > SMP cores observe the change. Target core calls isb() in IPI handler (Odd, if its just to synchronize the CPU, taking the IPI should be enough). > path, but not at the beginning of el1_irq entry. There's a chance > that modified instruction will appear prior isb(), and so will not be > observed. > > This patch inserts isb early at el1_irq entry to avoid that chance. > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > index ec2ee720e33e..9c06b4b80060 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > @@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ ENDPROC(el1_sync) > > .align 6 > el1_irq: > + isb // pairs with aarch64_insn_patch_text > kernel_entry 1 > enable_da_f > #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS > An ISB at the beginning of the vectors? This is odd, taking an IRQ to get in here would be a context-synchronization-event too, so the ISB is superfluous. The ARM-ARM has a list of 'Context-Synchronization event's (Glossary on page 6480 of DDI0487B.b), paraphrasing: * ISB * Taking an exception * ERET * (...loads of debug stuff...) Thanks, James