From: Chunhe Lan <b25806@freescale.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: kumar.gala@freescale.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
cjb@laptop.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Chunhe Lan <Chunhe.Lan@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mmc: Move mmc_delay() to include/linux/mmc/core.h
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:52:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505CD3A5.6080101@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201208101327.47789.arnd@arndb.de>
On 08/10/2012 09:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 10 August 2012, Chunhe Lan wrote:
>
>> +static inline void mmc_delay(unsigned int ms)
>> +{
>> + if (ms < 1000 / HZ) {
>> + cond_resched();
>> + mdelay(ms);
>> + } else {
>> + msleep(ms);
>> + }
>> +}
> I would actually question the point in this function to start with: The
> decision whether to call mdelay() or msleep() should only be based on
> whether you are allowed to sleep in the caller context. The idea of
>
>
> cond_resched();
> mdelay(ms);
>
> sets off alarm bells, and I would always replace that with msleep().
I think that it does not replace with msleep().
When the time of sleep is very short, program should not been scheduled
in the context. Because it expends the more time.
Thanks,
Chunhe
>
> Arnd
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-21 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-10 22:25 [PATCH v3 1/2] mmc: Move mmc_delay() to include/linux/mmc/core.h Chunhe Lan
2012-08-10 13:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-21 20:52 ` Chunhe Lan [this message]
2012-09-21 12:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-24 15:20 ` Chunhe Lan
2012-09-24 13:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-24 14:38 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=505CD3A5.6080101@freescale.com \
--to=b25806@freescale.com \
--cc=Chunhe.Lan@freescale.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).