From: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cmetcalf@tilera.com, Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
paulus@samba.org, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table depends on architecture
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:30:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BDC2CB.2030802@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354010422-19648-6-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 11/27/2012 06:00 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> For removing memory, we need to remove page table. But it depends
> on architecture. So the patch introduce arch_remove_memory() for
> removing page table. Now it only calls __remove_pages().
>
> Note: __remove_pages() for some archtecuture is not implemented
> (I don't know how to implement it for s390).
>
> CC: David Rientjes<rientjes@google.com>
> CC: Jiang Liu<liuj97@gmail.com>
> CC: Len Brown<len.brown@intel.com>
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt<benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> CC: Paul Mackerras<paulus@samba.org>
> CC: Christoph Lameter<cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim<minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton<akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> CC: Yasuaki Ishimatsu<isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang<wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> arch/ia64/mm/init.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/s390/mm/init.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/sh/mm/init.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/tile/mm/init.c | 8 ++++++++
> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 1 +
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 ++
> 9 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/mm/init.c b/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> index 082e383..e333822 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> @@ -689,6 +689,24 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
>
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + unsigned long start_pfn = start>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long nr_pages = size>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct zone *zone;
> + int ret;
> +
> + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
> + ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_warn("%s: Problem encountered in __remove_pages() as"
> + " ret=%d\n", __func__, ret);
> +
> + return ret;
Just a little question, why do we have different handlers for ret on
different platforms ? Sometimes we print a msg, sometimes we just
return, and sometimes we give a WARN_ON(). But no big deal. :)
Reviewed-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> index 0dba506..09c6451 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,18 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
>
> return __add_pages(nid, zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + unsigned long start_pfn = start>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long nr_pages = size>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct zone *zone;
> +
> + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
> + return __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> index 81e596c..b565190 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> @@ -257,4 +257,16 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> vmem_remove_mapping(start, size);
> return rc;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + /*
> + * There is no hardware or firmware interface which could trigger a
> + * hot memory remove on s390. So there is nothing that needs to be
> + * implemented.
> + */
> + return -EBUSY;
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
> diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> index 82cc576..1057940 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> @@ -558,4 +558,21 @@ int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 addr)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid);
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + unsigned long start_pfn = start>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long nr_pages = size>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct zone *zone;
> + int ret;
> +
> + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
> + ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + pr_warn("%s: Failed, __remove_pages() == %d\n", __func__,
> + ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
> diff --git a/arch/tile/mm/init.c b/arch/tile/mm/init.c
> index ef29d6c..2749515 100644
> --- a/arch/tile/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/tile/mm/init.c
> @@ -935,6 +935,14 @@ int remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> {
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> + return -EBUSY;
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif
>
> struct kmem_cache *pgd_cache;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> index 11a5800..b19eba4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> @@ -839,6 +839,18 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
>
> return __add_pages(nid, zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + unsigned long start_pfn = start>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long nr_pages = size>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct zone *zone;
> +
> + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
> + return __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index 3baff25..5675335 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -680,6 +680,21 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_add_memory);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + unsigned long start_pfn = start>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long nr_pages = size>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct zone *zone;
> + int ret;
> +
> + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
> + ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
>
> static struct kcore_list kcore_vsyscall;
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> index 38675e9..191b2d9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ extern void __online_page_free(struct page *page);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> extern bool is_pageblock_removable_nolock(struct page *page);
> +extern int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size);
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
>
> /* reasonably generic interface to expand the physical pages in a zone */
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 63d5388..e741732 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1111,6 +1111,8 @@ repeat:
> /* remove memmap entry */
> firmware_map_remove(start, start + size, "System RAM");
>
> + arch_remove_memory(start, size);
> +
> unlock_memory_hotplug();
>
> return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-04 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-27 10:00 [Patch v4 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 01/12] memory-hotplug: try to offline the memory twice to avoid dependence Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 9:17 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 02/12] memory-hotplug: check whether all memory blocks are offlined or not when removing memory Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 9:22 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 03/12] memory-hotplug: remove redundant codes Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 9:22 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 10:31 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 04/12] memory-hotplug: remove /sys/firmware/memmap/X sysfs Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table depends on architecture Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 9:30 ` Tang Chen [this message]
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 06/12] memory-hotplug: unregister memory section on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 9:34 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 07/12] memory-hotplug: implement register_page_bootmem_info_section of sparse-vmemmap Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 08/12] memory-hotplug: remove memmap " Wen Congyang
2012-11-28 9:40 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-30 1:45 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-30 2:47 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-30 2:55 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-12-03 2:23 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04 9:13 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-04 12:20 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-05 2:07 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-05 3:23 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-07 1:42 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07 2:20 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-12-04 9:47 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 09/12] memory-hotplug: remove page table of x86_64 architecture Wen Congyang
2012-12-07 6:43 ` Tang Chen
2012-12-07 7:06 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 10/12] memory-hotplug: memory_hotplug: clear zone when removing the memory Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 10:09 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 11/12] memory-hotplug: remove sysfs file of node Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 10:10 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 10:00 ` [Patch v4 12/12] memory-hotplug: free node_data when a node is offlined Wen Congyang
2012-12-04 10:10 ` Tang Chen
2012-11-27 19:27 ` [Patch v4 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory Andrew Morton
2012-11-27 19:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28 0:43 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-30 6:37 ` Tang Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50BDC2CB.2030802@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=wujianguo@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).