From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp [192.51.44.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F0522C00C2 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:29:54 +1100 (EST) Received: from m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (unknown [10.0.50.74]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F873EE0C1 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:29:51 +0900 (JST) Received: from smail (m4 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21F645DE55 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:29:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.94]) by m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82C045DE4F for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:29:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99E7E08005 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:29:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from m1000.s.css.fujitsu.com (m1000.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.240.81.136]) by s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE8B1DB8040 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:29:50 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <50DCE7C0.8070407@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:28:48 +0900 From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wen Congyang Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/14] memory-hotplug: free node_data when a node is offlined References: <1356350964-13437-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <1356350964-13437-15-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <50DA7533.6060407@jp.fujitsu.com> <50DC3C26.6060308@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <50DC3C26.6060308@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Tang Chen , linux-mm@kvack.org, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, cl@linux.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, rientjes@google.com, liuj97@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com, cmetcalf@tilera.com, wujianguo@huawei.com, yinghai@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, minchan.kim@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , (2012/12/27 21:16), Wen Congyang wrote: > At 12/26/2012 11:55 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki Wrote: >> (2012/12/24 21:09), Tang Chen wrote: >>> From: Wen Congyang >>> >>> We call hotadd_new_pgdat() to allocate memory to store node_data. So we >>> should free it when removing a node. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang >> >> I'm sorry but is it safe to remove pgdat ? All zone cache and zonelists are >> properly cleared/rebuilded in synchronous way ? and No threads are visinting >> zone in vmscan.c ? > > We have rebuilt zonelists when a zone has no memory after offlining some pages. > How do you guarantee that the address of pgdat/zone is not on stack of any kernel threads or other kernel objects without reference counting or other syncing method ? Thanks, -Kame