[PATCH] powerpc: kernel/kgdb.c: fix memory leakage

[PATCH] powerpc: kernel/kgdb.c: fix memory leakage

[Cong Ding]

the variable backup_current_thread_info isn't freed before existing the
function.

Signed-off-by: Cong Ding <dinggnu@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
index 8747447..5ca82cd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
@@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ static int kgdb_handle_breakpoint(struct pt_regs *regs)
 static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct thread_info *thread_info, *exception_thread_info;
-	struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info = \
-		(struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
+	struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info;
 
 	if (user_mode(regs))
 		return 0;
 
+	backup_current_thread_info = (struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
 	/*
 	 * On Book E and perhaps other processors, singlestep is handled on
 	 * the critical exception stack.  This causes current_thread_info()
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		/* Restore current_thread_info lastly. */
 		memcpy(exception_thread_info, backup_current_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
 
+	kfree(backup_current_thread_info);
 	return 1;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: kernel/kgdb.c: fix memory leakage

[Jason Wessel]

On 01/14/2013 11:26 AM, Cong Ding wrote:
> the variable backup_current_thread_info isn't freed before existing the
> function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cong Ding <dinggnu@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c |    5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> index 8747447..5ca82cd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> @@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ static int kgdb_handle_breakpoint(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>  	struct thread_info *thread_info, *exception_thread_info;
> -	struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info = \
> -		(struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info;



Woh...  This is definitely wrong.  You have found a problem for sure,
but this is not the right way to fix it.

It is not a good idea to kmalloc while single stepping because you can
hang the kernel if you single step any operation in kmalloc().

I am in the process of going through all the kgdb mails from the last
few months while I had been away from the project, so I didn't catch
this one and I see it has upstream commit (fefd9e6f8).  I'll submit
another patch to fix this the right way and use a static variable.
This is ok to use a static variable here because this is not something
we can recursively call at a single CPU level.

If Ben prefers we not burn the memory unless kgdb is active we can
kmalloc / kfree the space we need at the time that kgdb is
initialized.  Else we can go with this patch you see below.  We'll see
what Ben desires.

-----
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
index a7bc752..bb12c8b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
@@ -151,15 +151,16 @@ static int kgdb_handle_breakpoint(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static struct thread_info kgdb_backup_thread_info[NR_CPUS];
+
 static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct thread_info *thread_info, *exception_thread_info;
-	struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info;
+	int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
 
 	if (user_mode(regs))
 		return 0;
 
-	backup_current_thread_info = (struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
 	/*
 	 * On Book E and perhaps other processors, singlestep is handled on
 	 * the critical exception stack.  This causes current_thread_info()
@@ -175,7 +176,7 @@ static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	if (thread_info != exception_thread_info) {
 		/* Save the original current_thread_info. */
-		memcpy(backup_current_thread_info, exception_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
+		memcpy(&kgdb_backup_thread_info[cpu], exception_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
 		memcpy(exception_thread_info, thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
 	}
 
@@ -183,9 +184,8 @@ static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	if (thread_info != exception_thread_info)
 		/* Restore current_thread_info lastly. */
-		memcpy(exception_thread_info, backup_current_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
+		memcpy(exception_thread_info, &kgdb_backup_thread_info[cpu], sizeof *thread_info);
 
-	kfree(backup_current_thread_info);
 	return 1;
 }
 

-----


Thanks,
Jason.


>  
>  	if (user_mode(regs))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	backup_current_thread_info = (struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	/*
>  	 * On Book E and perhaps other processors, singlestep is handled on
>  	 * the critical exception stack.  This causes current_thread_info()
> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  		/* Restore current_thread_info lastly. */
>  		memcpy(exception_thread_info, backup_current_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
>  
> +	kfree(backup_current_thread_info);
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> 

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: kernel/kgdb.c: fix memory leakage

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 20:04 -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:

> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> > index 8747447..5ca82cd 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> > @@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ static int kgdb_handle_breakpoint(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> >  	struct thread_info *thread_info, *exception_thread_info;
> > -	struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info = \
> > -		(struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info;
> 
> 
> 
> Woh...  This is definitely wrong.  You have found a problem for sure,
> but this is not the right way to fix it.
>
> It is not a good idea to kmalloc while single stepping because you can
> hang the kernel if you single step any operation in kmalloc().

Ok. I applied the fix because it was obviously correct vs. the previous
version of the code (ie. the kmalloc was already there)

> I am in the process of going through all the kgdb mails from the last
> few months while I had been away from the project, so I didn't catch
> this one and I see it has upstream commit (fefd9e6f8).  I'll submit
> another patch to fix this the right way and use a static variable.
> This is ok to use a static variable here because this is not something
> we can recursively call at a single CPU level.

But a static will be shared by all CPUs or do you mean a per-cpu one ?

> If Ben prefers we not burn the memory unless kgdb is active we can
> kmalloc / kfree the space we need at the time that kgdb is
> initialized.  Else we can go with this patch you see below.  We'll see
> what Ben desires.

What about the stack ? thread info isn't very big...

Cheers,
Ben.

> -----
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> index a7bc752..bb12c8b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
> @@ -151,15 +151,16 @@ static int kgdb_handle_breakpoint(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> +static struct thread_info kgdb_backup_thread_info[NR_CPUS];
> +
>  static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>  	struct thread_info *thread_info, *exception_thread_info;
> -	struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info;
> +	int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>  
>  	if (user_mode(regs))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	backup_current_thread_info = (struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	/*
>  	 * On Book E and perhaps other processors, singlestep is handled on
>  	 * the critical exception stack.  This causes current_thread_info()
> @@ -175,7 +176,7 @@ static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  
>  	if (thread_info != exception_thread_info) {
>  		/* Save the original current_thread_info. */
> -		memcpy(backup_current_thread_info, exception_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
> +		memcpy(&kgdb_backup_thread_info[cpu], exception_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
>  		memcpy(exception_thread_info, thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -183,9 +184,8 @@ static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  
>  	if (thread_info != exception_thread_info)
>  		/* Restore current_thread_info lastly. */
> -		memcpy(exception_thread_info, backup_current_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
> +		memcpy(exception_thread_info, &kgdb_backup_thread_info[cpu], sizeof *thread_info);
>  
> -	kfree(backup_current_thread_info);
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> 
> -----
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason.
> 
> 
> >  
> >  	if (user_mode(regs))
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > +	backup_current_thread_info = (struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	/*
> >  	 * On Book E and perhaps other processors, singlestep is handled on
> >  	 * the critical exception stack.  This causes current_thread_info()
> > @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  		/* Restore current_thread_info lastly. */
> >  		memcpy(exception_thread_info, backup_current_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
> >  
> > +	kfree(backup_current_thread_info);
> >  	return 1;
> >  }
> >  
> > 

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: kernel/kgdb.c: fix memory leakage

[tiejun.chen]

On 02/08/2013 10:41 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 20:04 -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
>>> index 8747447..5ca82cd 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
>>> @@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ static int kgdb_handle_breakpoint(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>   static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>   {
>>>   	struct thread_info *thread_info, *exception_thread_info;
>>> -	struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info = \
>>> -		(struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info;
>>
>>
>>
>> Woh...  This is definitely wrong.  You have found a problem for sure,
>> but this is not the right way to fix it.
>>
>> It is not a good idea to kmalloc while single stepping because you can
>> hang the kernel if you single step any operation in kmalloc().
>
> Ok. I applied the fix because it was obviously correct vs. the previous
> version of the code (ie. the kmalloc was already there)
>
>> I am in the process of going through all the kgdb mails from the last
>> few months while I had been away from the project, so I didn't catch
>> this one and I see it has upstream commit (fefd9e6f8).  I'll submit
>> another patch to fix this the right way and use a static variable.
>> This is ok to use a static variable here because this is not something
>> we can recursively call at a single CPU level.
>
> But a static will be shared by all CPUs or do you mean a per-cpu one ?
>
>> If Ben prefers we not burn the memory unless kgdb is active we can
>> kmalloc / kfree the space we need at the time that kgdb is
>> initialized.  Else we can go with this patch you see below.  We'll see
>> what Ben desires.
>
> What about the stack ? thread info isn't very big...


Actually booke already copy the thread_info when we enter the debug exception, 
and I will send a patch to do the same thing for book3e, so I also remove these 
copying action here then we're happy without these nasty stuff :)

Tiejun

>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
>> -----
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
>> index a7bc752..bb12c8b 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
>> @@ -151,15 +151,16 @@ static int kgdb_handle_breakpoint(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>   	return 1;
>>   }
>>
>> +static struct thread_info kgdb_backup_thread_info[NR_CPUS];
>> +
>>   static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>   {
>>   	struct thread_info *thread_info, *exception_thread_info;
>> -	struct thread_info *backup_current_thread_info;
>> +	int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>>
>>   	if (user_mode(regs))
>>   		return 0;
>>
>> -	backup_current_thread_info = (struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
>>   	/*
>>   	 * On Book E and perhaps other processors, singlestep is handled on
>>   	 * the critical exception stack.  This causes current_thread_info()
>> @@ -175,7 +176,7 @@ static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>
>>   	if (thread_info != exception_thread_info) {
>>   		/* Save the original current_thread_info. */
>> -		memcpy(backup_current_thread_info, exception_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
>> +		memcpy(&kgdb_backup_thread_info[cpu], exception_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
>>   		memcpy(exception_thread_info, thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
>>   	}
>>
>> @@ -183,9 +184,8 @@ static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>
>>   	if (thread_info != exception_thread_info)
>>   		/* Restore current_thread_info lastly. */
>> -		memcpy(exception_thread_info, backup_current_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
>> +		memcpy(exception_thread_info, &kgdb_backup_thread_info[cpu], sizeof *thread_info);
>>
>> -	kfree(backup_current_thread_info);
>>   	return 1;
>>   }
>>
>>
>> -----
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jason.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>   	if (user_mode(regs))
>>>   		return 0;
>>>
>>> +	backup_current_thread_info = (struct thread_info *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct thread_info), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>   	/*
>>>   	 * On Book E and perhaps other processors, singlestep is handled on
>>>   	 * the critical exception stack.  This causes current_thread_info()
>>> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static int kgdb_singlestep(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>   		/* Restore current_thread_info lastly. */
>>>   		memcpy(exception_thread_info, backup_current_thread_info, sizeof *thread_info);
>>>
>>> +	kfree(backup_current_thread_info);
>>>   	return 1;
>>>   }
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>