From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp03.au.ibm.com (e23smtp03.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e23smtp03.au.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 351392C02F9 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:15:04 +1100 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp03.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 13:08:40 +1000 Received: from d23relay05.au.ibm.com (d23relay05.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.152]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4923578053 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:14:56 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r2432DRj56229892 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:02:14 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r243EtGG012152 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:14:56 +1100 Message-ID: <513411AD.5010408@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:14:53 +0800 From: Mike Qiu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Enable multiple MSI feature in pSeries References: <1358235536-32741-1-git-send-email-qiudayu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1362107325.2712.2.camel@localhost> <20130301035417.GA17236@concordia> In-Reply-To: <20130301035417.GA17236@concordia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , 于 2013/3/1 11:54, Michael Ellerman 写道: > On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 11:08:45AM +0800, Mike wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Any comments? or any questions about my patchset? > You were going to get some performance numbers that show a definite > benefit for using more than one MSI. Yes, but my patch just enable the kernel to support this feature, whether to use it depens on the device driver. And this feature has been merged to the kernel for X86 for a long time. See commit: 5ca72c4f7c412c2002363218901eba5516c476b1 51906e779f2b13b38f8153774c4c7163d412ffd9 Actually, I'm trying to do the test. but it is difficult to do that test, because it mostly depends on how the device driver to use this feature, while the ipr driver patch was wrote by another person. also no any reply from her. > cheers >