From: Chen Yuanquan-B41889 <B41889@freescale.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Yuanquan Chen <Yuanquan.Chen@freescale.com>,
Hiroo Matsumoto <matsumoto.hiroo@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pci: fix PCI-e devices rescan issue on powerpc platform
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:26:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <517653D8.8000205@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51652C20.2060105@freescale.com>
On 04/10/2013 05:08 PM, Chen Yuanquan-B41889 wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 12:08 PM, Chen Yuanquan-B41889 wrote:
>> On 04/02/2013 11:10 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 19:26 +0800, Yuanquan Chen wrote:
>>>> So we move the DMA & IRQ initialization code from
>>>> pcibios_setup_devices() and
>>>> construct a new function pcibios_enable_device. We call this
>>>> function in
>>>> pcibios_enable_device, which will be called by PCI-e rescan code.
>>>> At the
>>>> meanwhile, we avoid the the impact on cardbus. I also validate this
>>>> patch with
>>>> silicon's PCIe-sata which encounters the IRQ issue.
>>> My worry is that this delays the setup of the IRQ and DMA to very
>>> late in
>>> the process, possibly after the quirks have been run, which can be
>>> problematic. We have platform hooks that might try to "fixup" specific
>>> IRQ issues on some platforms (especially macs) which I worry might fail
>>> if delayed that way (I may be wrong, I don't have a specific case in
>>> mind,
>>> but I would feel better if we kept setting up these things earlier).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ben.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> I have checked all the quirk functions which are declared in kernel
>> arch/powerpc
>> with command :
>> grep DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ `find arch/powerpc/ *.[hc]`
>>
>> All the quirk function are defined as DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY ,
>> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER
>> and DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL, except quirk_uli5229() in
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/fsl_uli1575.c, which is
>> defined both as DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER and
>> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_RESUME. So the quirk_uli5229()
>> will also be called with PCI pm module. The quirk functions defined
>> as xxx_FINAL, HEADER and EARLY,
>> will be called in the path:
>>
>> pci_scan_child_bus()->pci_scan_slot()->pci_scan_single_device()->pci_scan_device()->pci_setup_device()
>>
>> ->pci_device_add()
>>
>> the pci_scan_slot() is called earlier than pcibios_fixup_bus() even
>> for the first scan of PCI-e bus, so the quirk
>> functions on powerpc platform is called before the DMA & IRQ fixup.
>> So in reality, the delay of DMA & IRQ fixup
>> won't affect anything.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Yuanquan
>>
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> How do you think about this? Do you have any comment?
>
> Thanks,
> Yuanquan
>
Hi Bjorn,
There's no response from Ben. How do you think about this patch? What's
your advice?
Thanks,
Yuanquan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-23 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-02 11:26 [PATCH] powerpc/pci: fix PCI-e devices rescan issue on powerpc platform Yuanquan Chen
2013-04-02 15:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-04-03 4:08 ` Chen Yuanquan-B41889
2013-04-10 9:08 ` Chen Yuanquan-B41889
2013-04-23 9:26 ` Chen Yuanquan-B41889 [this message]
2013-04-23 10:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-04-23 10:51 ` Chen Yuanquan-B41889
2013-04-23 11:30 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=517653D8.8000205@freescale.com \
--to=b41889@freescale.com \
--cc=Yuanquan.Chen@freescale.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=matsumoto.hiroo@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).