From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com (e28smtp02.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e28smtp02.in.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 497592C00AB for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:02:09 +1000 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp02.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 1 May 2013 10:26:10 +0530 Received: from d28relay03.in.ibm.com (d28relay03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.60]) by d28dlp01.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA1AE004A for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 10:34:10 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (d28av01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.63]) by d28relay03.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r4151pWA10223976 for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 10:31:52 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av01.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r4151vNo015856 for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 05:01:58 GMT Message-ID: <5180A1AD.4060409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 10:31:33 +0530 From: Vasant Hegde MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the powerpc tree References: <20130501120636.0e54681b2dfb7ebe6aeb27c4@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20130501120636.0e54681b2dfb7ebe6aeb27c4@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 05/01/2013 07:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Al, > > Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in > arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c between commit fb4696c39573 > ("powerpc/rtas_flash: Fix bad memory access") from the powerpc tree and > commits ad18a364f186 ("powerpc/rtas_flash: Free kmem upon module exit") > and 2352ad01409d ("ppc: Clean up rtas_flash driver somewhat") from the > vfs tree. > Stephen, As Ben mentioned earlier, there are outstanding comments from me which needs to be addressed by Dave, before its merged. -Vasant > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). >