From: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Make hard_irq_disable() do the right thing vs. irq tracing
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 15:15:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5188AA2D.1040802@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367910242.5769.11.camel@pasglop>
On 05/07/2013 03:04 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> If hard_irq_disable() is called while interrupts are already soft-disabled
> (which is the most common case) all is already well.
>
> However you can (and in some cases want) to call it while everything is
> enabled (to make sure you don't get a lazy even, for example before entry
> into KVM guests) and in this case we need to inform the irq tracer that
> the irqs are going off.
>
> We have to change the inline into a macro to avoid an include circular
> dependency hell hole.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
>
> Tested on pseries, Scott, I don't expect a problem with that patch especially
> since most callers already are soft disabled, so I'll merge it now along with
> my other pending stuff and you can simplify your KVM one.
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> index e45c494..d615b28 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> @@ -95,15 +95,13 @@ static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void)
> #define __hard_irq_disable() __mtmsrd(local_paca->kernel_msr, 1)
> #endif
>
> -static inline void hard_irq_disable(void)
> -{
> - __hard_irq_disable();
> - get_paca()->soft_enabled = 0;
> - get_paca()->irq_happened |= PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS;
> -}
> -
> -/* include/linux/interrupt.h needs hard_irq_disable to be a macro */
> -#define hard_irq_disable hard_irq_disable
> +#define hard_irq_disable() do { \
> + __hard_irq_disable(); \
> + if (local_paca->soft_enabled) \
> + trace_hardirqs_off(); \
> + get_paca()->soft_enabled = 0; \
Could we simplify this as follows:
+#define hard_irq_disable() do { \
+ __hard_irq_disable(); \
+ if (get_paca()->soft_enabled) { \
+ trace_hardirqs_off(); \
+ get_paca()->soft_enabled = 0; \
+ } \
+ get_paca()->irq_happened |= PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS; \
+} while(0)
Tiejun
> + get_paca()->irq_happened |= PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS; \
> +} while(0)
>
> static inline bool lazy_irq_pending(void)
> {
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-07 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-07 7:04 [PATCH] powerpc: Make hard_irq_disable() do the right thing vs. irq tracing Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-07 7:15 ` tiejun.chen [this message]
2013-05-07 7:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5188AA2D.1040802@windriver.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mihai.caraman@freescale.com \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).