linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, mikey@neuling.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc, perf: Ignore separate BHRB privilege state filter request
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 15:32:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A32F1F.5020109@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519C88D9.30009@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 05/22/2013 02:29 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>> Your description from patch 0 should be here.
> Does it sound better ?
> 
>>
>>> -	if ((br_privilege != 7) && (br_privilege != 0))
>>> -		return -1;
>>> +
>>> +	if (br_privilege)
>>> +		pr_info("BHRB privilege state filter request %llx ignored\n",
>>> +								br_privilege);
>>
>> Don't do that. Ignoring the br_privilege is either the right thing to do
>> in which case we do it and print nothing,
> 
> 
> I thought the informational print would at least make the user aware
> of the fact that the separate filter request for BHRB went ignored.
> Can we add this some where in the documentation ?

So, what we decide here ? We will just ignore any separate BHRB
privilege state filter request without printing any informational
event or warning ?

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-27 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-22  5:47 [PATCH 0/2] Improvement and fixes for BHRB Anshuman Khandual
2013-05-22  5:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc, perf: Ignore separate BHRB privilege state filter request Anshuman Khandual
2013-05-22  7:14   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-05-22  8:59     ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-05-27 10:02       ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2013-05-27 23:30         ` Michael Neuling
2013-05-22  5:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc, perf: BHRB filter configuration should follow the task Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51A32F1F.5020109@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).