From: Lian Minghuan-b31939 <B31939@freescale.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Zang Roy-R61911 <r61911@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/fsl_msi: add 'msiregs' kernel parameter
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:10:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BFCF99.1010608@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371514692.9073.12@snotra>
Hi Scott,
please see my comments inline.
On 06/18/2013 08:18 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/17/2013 12:36:50 AM, Lian Minghuan-b31939 wrote:
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> please see my comments inline.
>>
>> On 06/15/2013 06:13 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 06/14/2013 02:15:59 AM, Minghuan Lian wrote:
>>>> 1. Only MSIIR1 can index 16 MSI registers, but when using MSIIR1
>>>> the IRQs of a register are not continuous. for example, the first
>>>> register irq values are 0x0, 0x10, 0x20, 0x30 ... 0x1f0. So it
>>>> is hard to use 'msi-available-ranges' property to indicate the
>>>> available ranges and 'msi-available-ranges' property has been
>>>> removed from dts node, so this patch removes the related code.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Add 'msiregs' kernel parameter instead of 'msi-available-ranges'
>>>> functionality.
>>>
>>> The reason we used a device tree property was because this is for
>>> virtualization and AMP scenarios where this instance of Linux does
>>> not own all of the MSI registers.
>>>
>>> I don't see any reasonable way to partition an MPIC v4.3 MSI group
>>> -- but there are more groups, so it's not that bad. What's the use
>>> case for this patch?
>>>
>> [Minghuan] I do not known any case about this patch. I add 'msiregs'
>> just for achieving "msi-available-ranges" functionality. I do not
>> want to remove partition functionality when updating to mpic4.3,
>> although I do not see virtualization and AMP cases on T4(KVM does not
>> need this functionality).
>
> Such functionality does not work on mpic v4.3. There are conflicting
> requirements of contiguous MSIs (because PCI devices can use them that
> way) and the inability to partition a single register (because they
> all go to the same MPIC interrupt).
>
> Keep msi-available-ranges as is for older hardware, and just ignore it
> (with a warning printed) if it's present on MPIC v4.3.
>
[Minghuan] Thanks for your guidance.
But 'msireg' should be remained or removed? if remaining 'msiregs', it
should be for all mpic or only for mpic v4.3?
> -Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-18 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-14 7:15 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/dts: add MPIC v4.3 dts node Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 7:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/fsl_msi: add MSIIR1 support for MPIC v4.3 Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 22:09 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 3:00 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:15 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-18 2:34 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 18:08 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-14 7:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/dts: update MSI bindings doc " Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 22:06 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 5:07 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:28 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-18 0:42 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-18 2:49 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 16:21 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-14 7:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/dts: remove msi-available-ranges property Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 22:10 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 5:15 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:13 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-14 7:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/fsl_msi: add 'msiregs' kernel parameter Minghuan Lian
2013-06-14 22:13 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 5:36 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:18 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-18 3:10 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939 [this message]
2013-06-18 16:22 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-14 20:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/dts: add MPIC v4.3 dts node Scott Wood
2013-06-14 21:53 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-17 2:23 ` Lian Minghuan-b31939
2013-06-18 0:18 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51BFCF99.1010608@freescale.com \
--to=b31939@freescale.com \
--cc=Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=r61911@freescale.com \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).