Re: [PATCH] Do not update sysfs cpu registration from invalid context

[Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On 06/24/2013 08:50 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 02:25:59PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
>> On 06/24/2013 02:16 PM, Seth Jennings wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:18:04PM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:14:23AM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
>>>>> The topology update code that updates the cpu node registration in sysfs
>>>>> should not be called while in stop_machine(). The register/unregister
>>>>> calls take a lock and may sleep.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch moves these calls outside of the call to stop_machine().
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by:Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> Gah! I _knew_ I should have waited for my cross compiler to finish
>>> building.  This thing doesn't build:
>>>
>>>   CC      arch/powerpc/mm/numa.o
>>> /home/sjennings/ltc/linux/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c: In function 'arch_update_cpu_topology':
>>> /home/sjennings/ltc/linux/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c:1486: error: 'update' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> /home/sjennings/ltc/linux/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c:1486: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>>> /home/sjennings/ltc/linux/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c:1486: error: for each function it appears in.)
>>>
>>> s/update/ud/ in the *_cpu_under_node() calls.
>>
>> Oops! Time for patch submission re-education training.
> 
> We've all done it, but yes :)
> 
> I try to stick to:
> 
>   1. write code.

I would suggest
    1a. ensure you have the proper config options set

>   2. build code.
>   3. test code.
>   4. submit code.
> 
> I imagine you tested an early version of the patch, or on RHEL or
> something, but that can bite you like this. Whenever possible you should
> build & test the exact code you submit, though that can be hard when
> trees are moving quickly underneath you.

Yep, bitten by 1a. I didn't verify the config options I was building
with and had SMP disabled in the tree. This ifdef'ed out my code.

-Nathan