From: Chris Friesen <cbf123@mail.usask.ca>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: visible memory seems wrong in kexec crash dump kernel
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:08:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E07056.8040007@mail.usask.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130712012142.GA24112@concordia>
On 07/11/2013 07:21 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:22:49PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
>> On 07/11/2013 02:55 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm running 2.6.34 with kexec 2.0.1 on a Freescale p5020-based system
>>> with 8GB of memory. (It's an embedded system and I can't do much
>>> about the fact that it's using older software.)
>>
>> I should probably clarify this...I may be able to update kexec, I
>> can't update the kernel but I can backport more recent code if
>> necessary.
>>
>> Looking at the version of kexec that I have, it seems like where x86
>> uses "memmap=" to specify the memory map usable by the capture
>> kernel, powerpc does something different.
>
> From memory, it's been years, on powerpc we add properties to the memory
> nodes in the device tree that specify which memory is usable. The
> properties are called "linux,usable-memory", and in modern kernels they
> are read in early_init_dt_scan_memory().
I turned on the instrumentation in early_init_dt_scan_memory() and got
the following when jumping to the capture kernel:
memory scan node memory, reg size 16, data: 0 0 2 0,
- 0 , 200000000
That 0x200000000 matches the fact that I'm seeing 8GB of memory
available in the recovery kernel.
If I boot the original kernel with "crashkernel=224M@32M", should I
expect that only 224MB is marked as "linux,usable-memory" in the
recovery kernel?
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-12 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-11 20:55 visible memory seems wrong in kexec crash dump kernel Chris Friesen
2013-07-11 21:22 ` Chris Friesen
2013-07-11 22:46 ` Chris Friesen
2013-07-12 1:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-07-12 21:08 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2013-07-12 22:59 ` Chris Friesen
2013-07-13 6:30 ` Chris Friesen
2013-07-14 4:36 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-07-14 5:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-14 23:08 ` Chris Friesen
2013-07-14 23:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-29 23:10 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-31 16:40 ` Friesen, Christopher
2013-07-31 16:50 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E07056.8040007@mail.usask.ca \
--to=cbf123@mail.usask.ca \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).