From: Chris Friesen <cbf123@mail.usask.ca>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: visible memory seems wrong in kexec crash dump kernel
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:59:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E08A40.80900@mail.usask.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E07056.8040007@mail.usask.ca>
On 07/12/2013 03:08 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> I turned on the instrumentation in early_init_dt_scan_memory() and got
> the following when jumping to the capture kernel:
>
> memory scan node memory, reg size 16, data: 0 0 2 0,
> - 0 , 200000000
>
> That 0x200000000 matches the fact that I'm seeing 8GB of memory
> available in the recovery kernel.
>
> If I boot the original kernel with "crashkernel=224M@32M", should I
> expect that only 224MB is marked as "linux,usable-memory" in the
> recovery kernel?
I started looking at the kexec side of things, and I noticed something a
bit odd. In most places dealing with the device tree in kexec it
accepts either "memory" or "memory@" for the memory node name. In
add_usable_mem_property() in arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c it seems to only accept
"memory@".
Is this expected behaviour? It seems to be the same in current git
versions of kexec-tools.
On my system I see "/proc/device-tree/memory".
If I modify add_usable_mem_property() to also accept "/memory" then my
recovery kernel boots up with
physicalMemorySize = 0x10000000
which is 256MB (which is still a bit odd since I specified 224MB for the
crashkernel).
However, it then hits the BUG() call at the end of mark_bootmem() in
mm/bootmem.c.
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-12 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-11 20:55 visible memory seems wrong in kexec crash dump kernel Chris Friesen
2013-07-11 21:22 ` Chris Friesen
2013-07-11 22:46 ` Chris Friesen
2013-07-12 1:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-07-12 21:08 ` Chris Friesen
2013-07-12 22:59 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2013-07-13 6:30 ` Chris Friesen
2013-07-14 4:36 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-07-14 5:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-14 23:08 ` Chris Friesen
2013-07-14 23:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-29 23:10 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-31 16:40 ` Friesen, Christopher
2013-07-31 16:50 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E08A40.80900@mail.usask.ca \
--to=cbf123@mail.usask.ca \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).